STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
actually, I have to say that I was amazed at how non-sexual the princesses were. it was almost as if they had gone out of their way to find unatractive pretty girls and dress them in ways that made them unatractive.
"Unattractive pretty girls"? Isn't that kind of oxymoronic? I knew/know a young woman, an aspiring actress, who did that work at Disneyland (They have a term for it--"face characters" or something like that). I thought she was pretty damn good looking by any standard. She found the work quite disagreeable. A lot of people (kids mostly) want to paw and maul the poor girls!
Jasmine is by far the hottest of the Disney princesses. Would crush.
Jasmine's alright, but it's all about Ariel and Belle. And vintage Tinkerbell (not the watered-down contemporary reinterpretation; I mean the original one, with a body modeled on Mae West's, and a scandalously short skirt). Yes, I've given this subject more thought than a grown man should. I am not ashamed.
I'll give Belle the #2 spot. Ariel loses points in my book for being a ginger.
I know a couple in their 70s who are planning on going to DisneyWorld in a couple of weeks. By themselves, no grandkids. Why? "Oh, we like the rides, and I like to see the kids." says he.
Nice beaver.
yeah, sort of hard to explain - all the girls had pretty faces, although with a lot of make up. none of them had nice bodies at all, although I also thought that they had worked on the costumes to de-sexualize them. I found them remarcebly unattractive, considering that they were basically pretty, young and not fat or too thin. just flat, strangly shaped, and artificial looking.
Sounds to me like it might be more the odd costumes than the physical shortcomings of the girls themselves that sort of "de-sexualize" them. Then too, I suspect the Disney staff are looking for girls who look "wholesome" or "family friendly" and not super-sexy. I wouldn't see a Megan Fox type getting a gig as Cinderella or Snow White!
I remember Jasmine scoring pretty well when I was 10. Maybe you got unlucky with the current cast?
yeah, that is about right. I found it very strange. the other thing is that the animals, the fulll body costumes, have rings around the pelvis, which extend the costume in such a way as you can't see the hips and crotch at all, and I think that this is a design to avoid any possible misconduct. its a wierd place