• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

MC General Chat

whorishconsumer

King Douche
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
5,837
Reaction score
7,239
<shrug> Cue up every Dieworkwear article about cultural issues and clothes.

I'm perfectly okay with general "Please Don't be a Slob" rules. I'm also okay with marijuana legalization but don't really like smelling it everywhere.

Derek and I are of similar minds here.

I, in fact, abhor the stench of pot, in particular the ******, stepped-on crap that people insist on smoking here in NYC. There is also manner of dress that, on occasion, I am brought to find unattractive. But neither of these matters of personal preference justify social policy that limits access to individuals based upon their recreational habits or mode of dress.

These kinds of policies are like 2 feet away from "Whites Only".
 

smittycl

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
20,209
Reaction score
33,403
Derek and I are of similar minds here.

I, in fact, abhor the stench of pot, in particular the ******, stepped-on crap that people insist on smoking here in NYC. There is also manner of dress that, on occasion, I am brought to find unattractive. But neither of these matters of personal preference justify social policy that limits access to individuals based upon their recreational habits or mode of dress.

These kinds of policies are like 2 feet away from "Whites Only".
The weed smell in Manhattan is nuts. It's everywhere. Mixes poorly with the pee smell on the Subway.

I agreed with Derek on the cultural appropriation arguments but still think some general rules for nicer places is fine. Beach bar? Wear all the stuff on that list above. More elegant place that wants a higher level of formality? Sure, gently mandate a simple dress code.

Anyway, I know what you mean and dress codes have certainly been used to keep some folks out.
 
Last edited:

beargonefishing

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
34,027
Reaction score
41,175
It all boils down to "If other people simply acted and dressed according to my preferences, respect/health/happiness/whateverX would follow." Hell, Jesus probably wore a simple tunic, which is indistinguishable from a moo moo, sans underwear. He was cross dressing.
 

Mirage-

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2021
Messages
606
Reaction score
633
It all boils down to "If other people simply acted and dressed according to my preferences, respect/health/happiness/whateverX would follow."
No, not really. We are not talking about imposing people how to dress in publicly accessible spaces, and much less whether it would bring any magical quality (which I don't think it would).
We are talking about whether it is fine for a restaurant (or equivalent) to have a (even very moderate and reasonable, in this case) dress code in the belief that it would enhance the experience of people that chose to go there. Which you might deny it does, but you actually can't, because you can't decide what enhances an experience for someone else, it's a personal thing.
But then you'll say it infringes on your freedom, or discriminates, etc etc which I don't agree with but will refrain from elaborating further as it's already been discussed to death in another thread and again, nothing good will ever come from this discussion as it's too ideologically charged.
 

ericgereghty

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2013
Messages
8,340
Reaction score
14,160
The weed smell in Manhattan is nuts. It's everywhere. Mixes poorly with the pee smell on the Subway.

I agreed with Derek on the cultural appropriation arguments but still think some general rules for nicer places is fine. Beach bar? Wear all the stuff on that list above. More elegant place that wants a higher level of formality? Sure, gently mandate a simple dress code.

Anyway, I know what you mean and dress codes have certainly been used to keep some folks out.
I'm surprised weed stank made it through the putrid garbage stank!
 

smittycl

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
20,209
Reaction score
33,403
My problem with Lardini is that it seems most of their own-brand jackets (at least those I've seen around, I assume there are pricier collections?) are polyester-lined. It boggles my mind why you would construct a nice jacket and then ruin it with poly lining, to save what, literally a couple euro per jacket over cupro/viscose?
Is this what you mean? "Lining: Polyester 100%, Viscose 52%, Cupro 48%"

Looks like just a blend of cupro and viscose.
 

smittycl

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
20,209
Reaction score
33,403
ehm? That makes 200% of which 100% is polyester. I assume one is the sleeves the other the body?
Here it is from a different site, this time with critical punctuation.

"100% polyester Lining : 54% cupro, 46% viscose"
 

Mirage-

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2021
Messages
606
Reaction score
633
Here it is from a different site, this time with critical punctuation.

"100% polyester Lining : 54% cupro, 46% viscose"
right, but it makes even less sense. I've actually seen this version too and was left confused, polyester isn't a blend of viscose and cupro no matter how you look at it. I still think they meant to say that sleeves are 100% poly and rest is a blend of viscose and cupro. Or maybe it's just a misprint (but a very widespread one on their tags).
 
Last edited:

smittycl

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
20,209
Reaction score
33,403
right, but it makes even less sense. I've actually seen this version too and was left confused, polyester isn't a blend of viscose and cupro no matter how you look at it. I still think they meant to say that sleeves are 100% poly and rest is a blend of viscose and cupro. Or maybe it's just a misprint (but a very widespread one on their tags).
My take was they used Poly as a catch-all term and then listed the specifics. I could be wrong as polyester is synthetic but cupro and viscose are semi-synthetic.
 

smittycl

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
20,209
Reaction score
33,403

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,999
Messages
10,593,282
Members
224,351
Latest member
Rohitmentor
Top