• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Is this really Norvegese construction?

Roger

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
16
Sure doesn't look like it. Norvegese has a split welt with prominent stitching through the welt and the upper. I don't see any of that here. It looks more like standard Goodyear welting, but I could be mistaken.

Here's some pics of Enzo Bonafe's version of Norvegese (the chukkas, Art. 3722 show it best):

http://enzobonafe.com/norvegese.html
 

bengal-stripe

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 23, 2002
Messages
4,626
Reaction score
1,285
That's a detail of "˜Norvegese' on a Lattanzi shoe.
See how the upper leather is turned out, then stitched down.

lattanzi003.jpg


Here a drawing of the construction principle:

Norvegese.jpg


The featured Sutor Mantellassi is a traditionally welted shoe.
 

Roger

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
16
Interesting as always, Bengal-stripe. So Norvegese doesn't have a reverse welt after all (actually no welt whatsoever, it would seem, but rather what? a midsole?). That would be Norwegian-welted, I suppose, that does have the reverse welt. That's a nice picture--the drawing. Can you tell us where you found it? Also, are the other construction categories available from the same source?
 

Roger

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
16
Thinking more about this, I find that the term "Norvegese" is used somewhat inconsistently. Some writers have equated it with "Norwegian," whereas others have seen it as identical to "Bentivegna." It also seems that the Italian cordwainers may use the term for a different construction method than do others. It is certainly not true that the Lattanzi shoe and the diagram can be seen as the same thing as Norwegian construction, which, in my experience at least, implies a reverse welt that is stitched into the upper. I think that Bengal-stripe's diagram may accurately reflect Italian conceptualizations of Norvegese, but I'm not sure that this weltless construction is universally labeled Norvegese. Bengal-stripe, might you have more information on this? Where the hell are Jcusey and Rider when they're needed?
 

itsstillmatt

The Liberator
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
13,969
Reaction score
2,086
Norvegese, which simply means Norwegian in Italian, can be done with or without a welt. Different shoemakers do it differently. Bentivegna also comes with various names, but it is distinct from Norwegian, always.

Some things are not so important to define perfectly. This is one of them. Buy shoes you like, and don't rely on people who have likely never spoken to a shoemaker in Italy who does the various constructions. Rider, on the other hand, is a good source of information, and Bengal's diagrams are also good.
 

Roger

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
16
Originally Posted by iammatt
Some things are not so important to define perfectly. This is one of them.
Well...Iammatt, maybe not to you! But there are others to whom consistent, unambiguous, and accurate descriptions are important.
smile.gif
 

mimile

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
236
Reaction score
1
No. This is a Blake construction ! If you look inside you will see the stitches ! this is neither a Norwegian nor a Goodyear. They are cheating !
 

Roger

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
16
Originally Posted by mimile
No. This is a Blake construction ! If you look inside you will see the stitches ! this is neither a Norwegian nor a Goodyear. They are cheating !
Oh, jeez, mimile, you're right! That interior stitching does look like Blake construction. The thick plotens....
 

dopey

Stylish Dinosaur
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
15,054
Reaction score
2,487
Originally Posted by iammatt
Norvegese, which simply means Norwegian in Italian, can be done with or without a welt. Different shoemakers do it differently. Bentivegna also comes with various names, but it is distinct from Norwegian, always. Some things are not so important to define perfectly. This is one of them. Buy shoes you like, and don't rely on people who have likely never spoken to a shoemaker in Italy who does the various constructions. Rider, on the other hand, is a good source of information, and Bengal's diagrams are also good.
This is consistent with my experience. When getting a pair of norwegian construction shoes made, the shoemaker put the question to me - did I want it done with or without a welt. But all things being equal, I would prefer precision in nomenclature, with the welted version having one name an the no-welt version having another.
Originally Posted by Roger
Well...Iammatt, maybe not to you! But there are others to whom consistent, unambiguous, and accurate descriptions are important.
smile.gif

+1, as said above.
 

itsstillmatt

The Liberator
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
13,969
Reaction score
2,086
Originally Posted by dopey
This is consistent with my experience. When getting a pair of norwegian construction shoes made, the shoemaker put the question to me - did I want it done with or without a welt.

But all things being equal, I would prefer precision in nomenclature, with the welted version having one name an the no-welt version having another.


+1, as said above.


As I told Roger in PM, the difficulty in coming up with precise nomenclature is enormous. You are talking about a country whose shoemaking tradition goes back much further than their use of a common language, so you will get different terms in different cities. Many craftsmen, even today, communicate as much in dialect as they do Italian, and each dialect has different words.
 

dopey

Stylish Dinosaur
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
15,054
Reaction score
2,487
Originally Posted by iammatt
As I told Roger in PM, the difficulty in coming up with precise nomenclature is enormous. You are talking about a country whose shoemaking tradition goes back much further than their use of a common language, so you will get different terms in different cities. Many craftsmen, even today, communicate as much in dialect as they do Italian, and each dialect has different words.

Then it is our job to civilize the savages. That is what the internet is for.
 

voxsartoria

Goon member
Timed Out
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
180
Originally Posted by iammatt
As I told Roger in PM, the difficulty in coming up with precise nomenclature is enormous. You are talking about a country whose shoemaking tradition goes back much further than their use of a common language, so you will get different terms in different cities. Many craftsmen, even today, communicate as much in dialect as they do Italian, and each dialect has different words.

To me, the classic nomenclature problem with the best Italian shoes is the description of "Goodyear" welting when the shoe is actually hand-welted.

If you're English or American, this means a Goodyear machine. The Italians, though, use the term imprecisely.

- B
 

itsstillmatt

The Liberator
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
13,969
Reaction score
2,086
Originally Posted by dopey
Then it is our job to civilize the savages. That is what the internet is for.
Once, I used a shoemaker who did not have email. I had to email a friend of his, who would then print out the message and bring it to his shop.
 

voxsartoria

Goon member
Timed Out
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
180
Originally Posted by iammatt
Once, I used a shoemaker who did not have email. I had to email a friend of his, who would then print out the message and bring it to his shop.

That is almost a haiku.

- B
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,006
Messages
10,593,386
Members
224,354
Latest member
K. L. George
Top