Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by luk-cha, Apr 7, 2011.
Get an F fitting. Worked for me!
and therein lies the rub. the front is squarer/flatter and the toe box i think is also lower and flatter. a slimmer sleeker look all in all. thus, on a man of my proportions it does look a bit funny, duck footed as spoo was kind enough to say.
at first i didnt want to admit it because of how much i like the 73, but after getting trial pairs in both lasts and seeing them first hand the difference was clear. as much as i like the 73 as a stand alone last, on my feet there was no question i looked better in the 71.
so is life, if you are a fat shit you cant always wear exactly what you want.
i told ya. hah
on the lacing!
I see what you are saying. If you tried them both then I guess you would know. FWIW, I don't think that you are a "fat shit".
you could not have been more right
why thank you. when you meet me you will see. spoo can testify.
Well, while you and spoo can do a shoe circle you and I can do a love handle circle.
It is the MH71 as others have said. I have big feet. They are 12.5G.
sounds like a great idea :lovehandlebump:
btw, we did a shoe serkle sat night, but i cant post it yet.
good choice. awesome.
obvious joke is obvious
size 11? if need be you can send me these instead.
on the six eyelet lacing for that deco.
best rtw shoe ever post here.
five is better.
But it still very very good.
new shots of a Deco shoes never gets old...
Deco is all MTO; I wonder whether dropping to five(*) eyelet lacing would be an acceptable variation for a specific order.
(*) Should that really be ten eyelet since that's the total number on the shoe or does one traditionally specify the number of pairs when talking about shoes?
Separate names with a comma.