- Joined
- Nov 18, 2009
- Messages
- 31,241
- Reaction score
- 30,130
Well there will always be a part of the "masses" who buy the cheapest options on the market. Those low cost options will be the last to make the switch. More so on PC as Apple will be the first and perhaps only computer maker to put these types of screens across the line. There will always be some cheap Chinese PC maker who will push a lower resolution rig at absurdly low prices.
The current 27 inch iMac already has a 2560 x 1440 screen and Apple's Retina Macbook Pro is 2560 x 1600 for a screen that's only 15 inches. We can be assured that the resolution on a Retina iMac at 21.5 or 27 inches will be much higher than the number you quoted above to retain a similar PPI to be marketed as Retina at those sizes.
Keep in mind that Retina for Apple doesn't just mean "high res," but is focused around a density that allows for the typical human eye to be unable to distinguish individual pixels at a certain viewing distance.
I agree that the web has not caught up to these high resolutions. It will happen as technology improves and evolves.
Sorry to drive the thread off topic. Just wanted to make these points.
S4 looks nice, but honestly if I was in the market for an Android phone I would take a long hard look at the HTC One Google Play Edition.
I dunno about that. People on tech sites are clamoring for them on desktops. And Retina is certainly helping push the masses there.
But right now, the actual masses are still buying low res displays in droves. My dad had a dell laptop in the late 90s (PIII era) that had a higher pixel density than basically everything dell sells today. When people do get high res displays, they complain that all the text is too small, then they run it at non-native resolution so everything looks blurry.
Its not like the hardware can't drive it. Integrated video on an i3 can push 2560x1440 without hesitation. Put that on a typical 23" display, and you've got pretty nice pixel density (I mean, it looks great at 27" and would be as good as the eye can see at 23"). The OS and applications are the real problem. Both OSX and Win7 (probably 8 too) do very well natively with high res displays...but 80% of the applications suck. And honestly, I spend all day looking at applications not the base OS.
Also, websites get kind of messed up. You can blow up the text, but unless you enlarge the images as well, all of the fancy CSS alignment breaks. Blowing up the images works fine, but they can get blurry depending on how much you enlarge them.
Well there will always be a part of the "masses" who buy the cheapest options on the market. Those low cost options will be the last to make the switch. More so on PC as Apple will be the first and perhaps only computer maker to put these types of screens across the line. There will always be some cheap Chinese PC maker who will push a lower resolution rig at absurdly low prices.
The current 27 inch iMac already has a 2560 x 1440 screen and Apple's Retina Macbook Pro is 2560 x 1600 for a screen that's only 15 inches. We can be assured that the resolution on a Retina iMac at 21.5 or 27 inches will be much higher than the number you quoted above to retain a similar PPI to be marketed as Retina at those sizes.
Keep in mind that Retina for Apple doesn't just mean "high res," but is focused around a density that allows for the typical human eye to be unable to distinguish individual pixels at a certain viewing distance.
I agree that the web has not caught up to these high resolutions. It will happen as technology improves and evolves.
Sorry to drive the thread off topic. Just wanted to make these points.
S4 looks nice, but honestly if I was in the market for an Android phone I would take a long hard look at the HTC One Google Play Edition.
Last edited: