Bellison
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 1
If you're buying high quality shoes like EG because you think you're saving money in the long run, you're a complete idiot.
If you correctly compare apples to apples, you will discover that buying high quality shoes is much more expensive than crappy shoes like KC.
If you want EG shoes to last 20 years, you will have to have at least 2 pairs because you have to rotate.
Therefore, two EGs will set you back $2,400.
If you only have 2 pairs, and you wear them 5-6 times a week, you will have to resole them about once every 4 years. That's 5 resoling for each shoe, which is 10 resoling for both shoes for 20 years of wear. Each resoling probably sets you back $400.
Therefore resoling will cost $4,000.
Plus, if you wear your shoes 5-6 times a week you should really treat your EG shoes well with Saphir renovateur, creme and wax which will easily set you back at least $50/year. For 20 years, that's $1,000.
Therefore the total cost of having 2 high quality shoes from EG to last 20 years is
$2,400 (Shoes) + $4,000 (resoling) + $1,000 (high quality Saphir products) = $7,400. Which works out to be $370/year for shoe ownership.
KCs retail for $170/pair. And if you buy 2 pairs that's $340.
If you wear them 5-6 times a week they will last you 3-4 years despite what some forum members profess. But assuming that they only last you 3 years, that means you will have to purchase shoes 6.66 times to last 20 years. That's 13.33 pairs of shoes. 13.33 * $170 = $2,267.
KCs don't require Saphir. If you do polish them, ordinary Kwiw will do which probably only sets you back $300 for 20 years. And KCs don't require resoling--you just throw them out when they're busted.
Therefore the total cost of KC ownership is $2,267 (13.33 pairs of shoes) + $300 (Kiwi products) + $0 (resoling) = $2567. Which works out to be $128.35/year. Therefore owning EGs is almost 3 times as much as owning crappy KCs.
Most people who purchase EGs are not deluded enough to think EGs will save them money. They buy EGs for the aesthetics, the old world craftsmanship and most importantly a piece of the heritage and dream of England/Europe. For luxury products crude economics should not be a factor.
If you correctly compare apples to apples, you will discover that buying high quality shoes is much more expensive than crappy shoes like KC.
If you want EG shoes to last 20 years, you will have to have at least 2 pairs because you have to rotate.
Therefore, two EGs will set you back $2,400.
If you only have 2 pairs, and you wear them 5-6 times a week, you will have to resole them about once every 4 years. That's 5 resoling for each shoe, which is 10 resoling for both shoes for 20 years of wear. Each resoling probably sets you back $400.
Therefore resoling will cost $4,000.
Plus, if you wear your shoes 5-6 times a week you should really treat your EG shoes well with Saphir renovateur, creme and wax which will easily set you back at least $50/year. For 20 years, that's $1,000.
Therefore the total cost of having 2 high quality shoes from EG to last 20 years is
$2,400 (Shoes) + $4,000 (resoling) + $1,000 (high quality Saphir products) = $7,400. Which works out to be $370/year for shoe ownership.
KCs retail for $170/pair. And if you buy 2 pairs that's $340.
If you wear them 5-6 times a week they will last you 3-4 years despite what some forum members profess. But assuming that they only last you 3 years, that means you will have to purchase shoes 6.66 times to last 20 years. That's 13.33 pairs of shoes. 13.33 * $170 = $2,267.
KCs don't require Saphir. If you do polish them, ordinary Kwiw will do which probably only sets you back $300 for 20 years. And KCs don't require resoling--you just throw them out when they're busted.
Therefore the total cost of KC ownership is $2,267 (13.33 pairs of shoes) + $300 (Kiwi products) + $0 (resoling) = $2567. Which works out to be $128.35/year. Therefore owning EGs is almost 3 times as much as owning crappy KCs.
Most people who purchase EGs are not deluded enough to think EGs will save them money. They buy EGs for the aesthetics, the old world craftsmanship and most importantly a piece of the heritage and dream of England/Europe. For luxury products crude economics should not be a factor.
Seriously. I can't see Kenneth Cole shoes lasting 25 years. EG's $1,100 divided by 25 = $220 per year.