gastarbeider
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
- Messages
- 282
- Reaction score
- 10
Really? What aren't you digging about this?
the trousers. cut. length.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
the trousers. cut. length.
what the **** is that coat.
Gilded Age T
the fit and design are a bit frumpy
daring is the nicest way to put it. i think its just plain ugly but to each his own i suppose...
the fit and design are a bit frumpy
"Be More Vague!" "Stuff about it looks not good." Actual criticism: Taking into account the regular fit as intended, the jacket hits a little high for my liking and, possibly because of this, looks kind of tent-ish at the waist. I don't really like the third pocket and I am not the biggest fan of the pattern as other have stated but tastes vary on that sort of stuff. The shoes are really thowing me off in terms of a) colour and b) the fact that they connote spring/summer which doesn't jive with the rest of the fit. I scrolled down expecting boots and got mocs. Seriously, people, how hard is it to elaborate on your dislike of someone's steeze.
I agree, the majority of people will look at the WWM piece and think it is hideous. As I previously mentioned, it was purchased as a hiking, camping, etc. piece. I will heed the advice and probably keep it in that part of my wardrobe going forward. Unless, anyone can suggest a better way to use it as a casual piece.