STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
@ Fran
Costco had a screaming deal on the Dyson 14 Plus at $249 so we went for it today. I just vacuumed with my excellent Blue Moon yesterday but I went ahead and tried the Dyson. The Dyson simply picked up half a tunnel full of dirt. It is a superb vacuum and has better performance, I'm said to say given the cost difference, than my well loved Miele.
Joint the rest of teh world , get teh wooden floors you dirty Amurikan.
I still have the Miele vac. Apart from being zee German-engineered (probably assembled by some guy named Mehmet) and NOT subject to retail mark-downs (say hello to BOSE), I fail to see what the fuss is about.
In these twisted times, the notion of "value" has long been tossed out of the window.
This is more of a global trade discussion for CE.
Depends on what you mean by "perform." Suction wise? Sure. Filtration wise? Definitely not.
What does a better job from a filtration standpoint? How do you measure filtration performance?
Any thoughts on the Rainbows that use water as a filtering element? A friend just got a vintage one and loves it. --Andre
By using a particle counter at the exhaust of the vacuum, as well as around any seams in the body. You can find plenty examples of this on youtube (though half of them are by marketing shills).