- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 25,700
- Reaction score
- 180
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Having read the posts by DWFII, I'm now very conscious of things like exposed stitches on the soles of shoes. The more you know, the more you expect of your purchases...
With a hand made anything you are not paying just for quality(quality defined as fit for purpose) What you are paying for is that it is hand made which can be a costly buisness, especially if there is little or no division of labour. Most artisanal workshops are very inefficient. Adam Smith anyone? Also, what people forget or overlook through ignorance of manufacturing processes is that in some cases it takes skill to use a machine, they often need careful setting up by the operator. Ask any machinist or tool maker in a machine shop. In my view the argument that that it is justifiable to spend say $3000 as opposed to $100 on a pair of shoes purely on quality grounds is silly.
Going by your points method of assignment, what shoes/ brand would you say are still in the positive territory?
What is this thread about? If no one can explain that, can you at least tell me if I have to throw out all my shoes?
Is there any true advantage to a completely hand-lasted shoe (every nail pounded in by the cordwainer) versus having a machine stretch the leather over the last?
DWFII, what is your opinion of using an aftermarket inserts/ insole on top of original insole, as a means to preserve or prolong the life of a shoe since many shoes cannot be recrafted satisfactorily once the original insoles are worn out or damaged.