MSchapiro
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,118
- Reaction score
- 335
I agree with you, I could have worded it better. The second trade is completely independent from the first.I agree with this absolutely, with one little quibble. The second 5% reference is a bit of red herring. As you note, you've already taken the 5% loss on the first trade. The second trade is a new, independent trade that really has nothing to do with the first (except for the facts that you may already have been following the stock, have an attachment to it, etc.) Thinking about "making back" your first 5%(as strong as the natural tendency to see things in such terms may be) muddles the issue. The real question is whether dropping the money for the second trade will make you more money over whatever your time horizon is than employing it somewhere else. I know that's basically what you're saying, but I think that semantically tying the investment decision to that past 5% hit on other money makes it a bit harder to make clear, sensible decisions.
I held it before and sold it when it hit the $60 range since technically that seemed to be its previous sticking point. It has stuck around there since.What do people think of SolarCity? Seems like it's a good play on renewable technology, high tech manufacturing and the direction of future energy Independence.
There is money in financing and installation of solar, but their push into manufacturing worries me. Frankly given the incredibly low prices of oil stocks currently I would rather put all my money there and wait out their return while solar progresses a little more.