• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Sartorial mythbusting

jefferyd

Distinguished Member
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,633
Reaction score
877
Originally Posted by tailorgod
High armhole: Yes! Small armhole... No!
Dukearmhole.jpg

AFAIK, A&S never cut for the Duke. Bad example.
 

voxsartoria

Goon member
Timed Out
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
180
Originally Posted by rach2jlc
That we are. You should see what we do with curtains!
Why, do you guys...sorry, I meant gays...cut for A&S?
Originally Posted by Manton
Speaking of this, in the 1890s, "gay" just meant "happy." It was a perfectly good word that the homos stole and I want it back.
iammatt wants the word liberal back, but Tomasso and I are keeping it. - B
 

rach2jlc

Prof. Fabulous
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1,162
Originally Posted by Manton
Speaking of this, in the 1890s, "gay" just meant "happy." It was a perfectly good word that the homos stole and I want it back.
I believe that's why some parties like to spell it "****." I'm not sure, though. In any case, I'd be happy to petition the Pink Dolphin Society to officially return the word to your camp, much as Hong Kong was returned to China after a designated period of time. Nevertheless, deep down I feel like your camp and my camp might be the same camp, so to whom would we really be returning the word? I also just want to make sure that FNB isn't included anywhere in the negotiations. He's like the "stylemeup" of fabulosity.
 

Manton

RINO
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
41,314
Reaction score
2,879
Originally Posted by rach2jlc
I believe that's why some parties like to spell it "****." I'm not sure, though.

In any case, I'd be happy to petition the Pink Dolphin Society to officially return the word to your camp, much as Hong Kong was returned to China after a designated period of time.

Nevertheless, deep down I feel like your camp and my camp might be the same camp, so to whom would we really be returning the word? I just want to make sure that FNB isn't included anywhere in the negotiations.


Actually, HK was granted to the Brits in perpetuity. Kowloon was on a 99 year lease which ended in 1997. The ChiComs made clear in the early '80s, that when the lease was up, they were not going to renew. Since HK cannot survive without Kowloon (no water on HK Island, for instance), the Brits had no choice but to make a deal.

What this has to do with anything I have no idea.
 

rach2jlc

Prof. Fabulous
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1,162
Originally Posted by Manton
Actually, HK was granted to the Brits in perpetuity. Kowloon was on a 99 year lease which ended in 1997. The ChiComs made clear in the early '80s, that when the lease was up, they were not going to renew. Since HK cannot survive without Kowloon (no water on HK Island, for instance), the Brits had no choice but to make a deal.

Orly.jpg
 

voxsartoria

Goon member
Timed Out
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
180
I'm pretty sure that Orientals don't drink water, so manton's HK theory is bunk.

I refer, of course, to True Orientals, and not to, say, George Takei or the dudes who used to play Charlie Chan.

- B
 

edmorel

Quality Seller!!
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
25,987
Reaction score
5,181
Originally Posted by voxsartoria
I'm pretty sure that Orientals don't drink water, so manton's HK theory is bunk.

I refer, of course, to True Orientals, and not to, say, George Takei or the dudes who used to play Charlie Chan.

- B


was George Takei a drapist
confused.gif
 

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,710
Reaction score
9,853
Originally Posted by voxsartoria
I'm pretty sure that Orientals don't drink water, so manton's HK theory is bunk.

I refer, of course, to True Orientals, and not to, say, George Takei or the dudes who used to play Charlie Chan.

- B


Am I a True Oriental?
 

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,710
Reaction score
9,853
Originally Posted by apropos
Depends on your Orientation?

I'm an oriented toward truth and the American Way.

Originally Posted by voxsartoria
Do you drink water?

Yes. But not if it's fizzy, and only with ice.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
507,006
Messages
10,593,434
Members
224,355
Latest member
ESF
Top