1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Lunges: Pick your poison

Discussion in 'Health & Body' started by Threadbearer, Mar 14, 2008.

  1. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    all sorts of idiots choose to pursue stupid activities and get their stupid asses dead in the process. doens't mean I have to admire it

    I agree but bodybuilding is not a stupid activity. This is a million dollar industry with million dollars endorsements, PPV and have a very long lineage.
     
  2. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Holy shit what a thread. Is this the same guy that posted that walnut-cracking-ass article?




    Justin, how did you not catch this one? The dude abides man, the dude abides...


    You mean like East Germany and the USSR didn't do with dbol?


    Careful man, winstrol totally cuts of testosterone production in the body. And you're going to need a lot of testosterone to bang broads like a real, perfectly proportioned, tanning lotioned bodybuilder with a little pee-pee.


    USAF rarely step on Iraqi soil. Too few golf courses.



    <--raises hand



    So why are the bodybuilding.com forums the internet mecca for steroid information?
    bodybuilding.com steroids forum subforum of "IFBB Pro Bodybuilding"
    The "Contest Prep Cycle" Thread
    * General Information on Anabolic Steroids *
    Propecia as a masking agent for steroids
    Anabolic Athletics- by Charlie Francis (Ben Johnsons Coach)


    You know, I like this. Iraq threads in the CE forum would have a lot less idiocy (at least in my addled brain) if I were in there talking to myself. Manton can talk to himself about politics, and you can oil yourself up in your own little body consciousness forum!



    1. Of course I am not saying no one takes performance enhancement drugs. What I am saying is that there is no proof Ronnie et all takes them in view of IFBB's strict stance on such illegal and unsportsman activities. BTW I dont mean they took them but were not caught.

    2. Who cares what bodybuilding forums talk about.
    On that token, if this forum have people selling fake Prada, does that mean Prada sells fake stuff? Jesus! The lengths people go to!
     
  3. Saucemaster

    Saucemaster Senior member

    Messages:
    6,678
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco
    2. Who cares what bodybuilding forums talk about.
    On that token, if this forum have people selling fake Prada, does that mean Prada sells fake stuff? Jesus! The lengths people go to!


    Your hilarious attempts to draw logical parallels are a source of never-ending amusement. Thank you.
     
  4. Bandwagonesque

    Bandwagonesque Senior member

    Messages:
    2,237
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Location:
    Canada
    To get that big would be like a disability. I'm 6'6" and around 220lbs right now, and add 100lbs of muscle to get close to those guys would make sports impossible, and traveling (cars, airplanes, trains, etc.) harder than it already is at my size. To get a lot bigger I'd lose a lot of speed, quickness and jumping ability, as well as the wear and tear on knees, ankles and my back.

    +1

    I use to be so huge, I couldn't even wipe my own ass.
     
  5. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Too bad I missed Saucemaster's poll. I would have contributed some more irresponsible slurs.

    Actually, bodybuilders won't be moving by me; I'm faster than they are.

    If anyone has a monopoly on front squats, it's the Olympic guys, not bodybuilders. According to your earlier logic (using the term very loosely), it's you who shouldn't be talking about front squats because you're the one who can't do them. I, on the other hand, can. Does that mean I'm a better bodybuilder than you? Or, if you think about it for just a second... does it mean that front squats are very useful for purposes other than bodybuilding? Wow...blows your mind, doesn't it?


    1. Just try making those slurs at bodybuilders in bodybuilding competitions and see how fast they will move, smarty mouth.

    2. Your point on front squat is pointless and contradictory. I have never professed I know and can do all bodybuilding routines.
     
  6. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Your hilarious attempts to draw logical parallels are a source of never-ending amusement. Thank you.

    You are as ever, the Cluelessmaster.

    Again by taking tiger02's argument to its logical conclusions, I have brought his theories into disrepute without resorting to making baseless allegations on others like unnatural, drug taking etc.
     
  7. smw356

    smw356 Senior member

    Messages:
    488
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    This is sophism perfected. It is truly magnificent to behold. Don't ever give up the good fight beasty.
     
  8. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    This is sophism perfected. It is truly magnificent to behold. Don't ever give up the good fight beasty.

    Sophism? Unlike you and your ilk, I go to lengths to rebut your unfounded and wild allegations. You instead give Ronnie a bad name (drug taker, grotesque, stupid) and hang him. And all without any basis or moral standing. Sheesh!
     
  9. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    +1

    I use to be so huge, I couldn't even wipe my own ass.


    Thats rubbish. I bet even Ronnie can wipe it if he put his hands between his dick rather than from the back.
     
  10. Philosoph

    Philosoph Senior member

    Messages:
    1,143
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Location:
    The corners of my mind
    I'm going to have to save this thread so I can show it to my future students as an example of excellent argumentative technique and logic. They will surely be amazed.
     
  11. Saucemaster

    Saucemaster Senior member

    Messages:
    6,678
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco
    You are as ever, the Cluelessmaster. Again by taking tiger02's argument to its logical conclusions, I have brought his theories into disrepute without resorting to making baseless allegations on others like unnatural, drug taking etc.
    When your conclusions land anywhere in the blissful realm of logic--which should happen, one of these days, if only by sheer chance--I will be the first to let you know.
     
  12. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    I'm going to have to save this thread so I can show it to my future students as an example of excellent argumentative technique and logic. They will surely be amazed.

    Future students? I didnt know Clown or Barber college teaches such advanced theories.
     
  13. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    When your conclusions land anywhere in the blissful realm of logic--which should happen, one of these days, if only by sheer chance--I will be the first to let you know.

    I am sure if I side with you and repeat the utter lie that Ronnie et al is on drugs, unnatural, suddenly I make the most sense in the world.
     
  14. tiger02

    tiger02 Senior member

    Messages:
    3,799
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Location:
    NYC
    Sophism? Unlike you and your ilk, I go to lengths to rebut your unfounded and wild allegations. You instead give Ronnie a bad name (drug taker, grotesque, stupid) and hang him. And all without any basis or moral standing. Sheesh!

    Racist.
     
  15. smw356

    smw356 Senior member

    Messages:
    488
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Thats rubbish. I bet even Ronnie can wipe it if he put his hands between his dick rather than from the back.

    that is almost sig worthy


    Beasty you are the best my friend.
     
  16. Saucemaster

    Saucemaster Senior member

    Messages:
    6,678
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco
    I am sure if I side with you and repeat the utter lie that Ronnie et al is on drugs, unnatural, suddenly I make the most sense in the world.

    No, I'm pretty certain you'd be incomprehensible on any side of any issue. I just lucked out that you're on the other side.
     
  17. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    No, I'm pretty certain you'd be incomprehensible on any side of any issue. I just lucked out that you're on the other side.

    Hmm. Coming from someone who cant rebut my points and resort to thats what I think and 95% of the population thinks so.
     
  18. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Beasty you are the best my friend.

    How did you know? Who told you that?
     
  19. beasty

    beasty Senior member

    Messages:
    968
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Racist.

    That was not racist. My point is how people in this forum give others a name (without any just cause or good reason) and then proceed to hang them without trial.

    Ronnie no doubt can kick any white sheets' ass.
     
  20. Saucemaster

    Saucemaster Senior member

    Messages:
    6,678
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Hmm. Coming from someone who cant rebut my points and resort to thats what I think and 95% of the population thinks so.

    [​IMG] Given that your idea of a rebuttal consists of refusing to provide counterarguments, simply claiming that you "already did so" and then refusing to post a link to the posts in which you provided these impeccable critiques, it's unsurprising that you've been unable to identify the many times that I (and many others) have rebutted your points (when you actually make one). The few times you've actually tried to argue logically, even by simple analogy, have been laughable to the point where I put the over/under on your age at about 14.

    I would take the over if "manchild" counts.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by