Jacques Marie Mage - Wolves, Obnoxious Acetate and The American Dream

[FlyingHorker]

I don’t think those are “1”s in front of the 48 and 25. Those are just | vertical lines |. 😄
just check my Fellinis, same thing.

| 51 • 20 |

Holy ****, this makes so much more sense now with my Dealans too.

Mind is blown.

 

[fmvazquez]

The last couple messages were wholesome as **** the 148 out of 251 got me

me too 😅, I might have to re-check the serial numbers of my JMM 😂

 

[verver]

@FlyingHorker, u can’t be serious?!😂

 

[FlyingHorker]

@FlyingHorker, u can’t be serious?!😂

I wasn't, I was checking to see how truly knowledgeable this thread is. Have to keep you all on your toes.

Spoiler

I was serious

 

[Mr. Six]

There we are.

What model is this?

 

[Thin White Duke]

Its 48 and 25 separated by vertical hash marks.
48 is the lens width, 25 is the bridge width.

(Edit - didn’t see the other posts before posting!😎)

 

[DorianGreen]

Hmm, could be. Makes sense for the 148, could be temple length.

I don't understand the 251 though.

Sorry, but this colourway is pretty awful. Could win the prize for the ugliest one.

 

[Facultyofzen]

I don’t think those are “1”s in front of the 48 and 25. Those are just | vertical lines |. 😄
Just checked my Fellinis, same thing.

| 51 • 20 |

There's two oddities here. Firstly the sizing is all wrong, as the NF Rodeo are 56 - 16, which is also the same sizing as the Montana. There is no chance the lens width is a 48 and the bridge 25. Secondly, the location of the sizing info is on the opposite temple to my Rodeos, but then maybe they changed it for the bison variants.

 

[DorianGreen]

There's two oddities here. Firstly the sizing is all wrong, as the NF Rodeo are 56 - 16, which is also the same sizing as the Montana. There is no chance the lens width is a 48 and the bridge 25. Secondly, the location of the sizing info is on the opposite temple to my Rodeos.

View attachment 1884002

Cannot judge with certainty, but it seems unlikely to me too that the lens width could be only 48. The glasses look very large.

 

[lsterling]

There's two oddities here. Firstly the sizing is all wrong, as the NF Rodeo are 56 - 16, which is also the same sizing as the Montana. There is no chance the lens width is a 48 and the bridge 25. Secondly, the location of the sizing info is on the opposite temple to my Rodeos, but then maybe they changed it for the bison variants.

View attachment 1884002

I remember feeling like the Bison Rodeo was way too large when I tried it on, but the normal Rodeo/PCH/Montana is fine.

 

[Guitar Preacher]

There's two oddities here. Firstly the sizing is all wrong, as the NF Rodeo are 56 - 16, which is also the same sizing as the Montana. There is no chance the lens width is a 48 and the bridge 25. Secondly, the location of the sizing info is on the opposite temple to my Rodeos, but then maybe they changed it for the bison variants.

View attachment 1884002

here is a picture from Leidmann’s

 

[RegisDB9]

I want those Bisons so I can walk up to random people and say:

 

[DorianGreen]

here is a picture from Leidmann’s View attachment 1884021

Yes, and the same website tells "Eye 56 mm". We have already experienced these JMM "official" photos reporting wrong sizes.

The pair looks absolutely authentic though.
Possible to have here a prototype with a reduced size, not gone in production afterwards?

 

[Pureneat]

Yeah, Ichikawa all over again…….

 

[FlyingHorker]

@Guitar Preacher thanks for the sleuthing.

Here are some comparisons to my Akila Miracle aviators. They're 50/20 for Lens width/Bridge, the same as my Dealans. They have more lens height due to being aviators.

They seem large, but not 56 lens width large. My head/face is small-medium shaped. They feel very similiar to my Akila's in terms of fit as well.

Spoiler: Akila Miracle size vs. JMM Bison Rodeo