idfnl
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 17,305
- Reaction score
- 1,260
Even so, you run a business, you have a right to a profit if it exists. For me, F1 is a **** investment. I don't understand Haas getting involved. Just look at Toyota's endless resources and what did they get? A couple of Jarno Trulli podiums?
Dennis can talk that **** because he has the resources. If Sauber spent within a profit model like Macca does, they'd be outside the 107% rule.
re Ron Dennis, he was criticizing teams like Sauber, not defending them. His point was that McLaren never spends enough to endanger the overall operation.
You could be right about the profit-taking, but I don't think you are.
Virgin came in more on the basis of restrictions on spending than on the promise of equitable distribution of revenue. Mosley sold them a bill of goods, and by the time that was confirmed, they were already committed.
Even so, you run a business, you have a right to a profit if it exists. For me, F1 is a **** investment. I don't understand Haas getting involved. Just look at Toyota's endless resources and what did they get? A couple of Jarno Trulli podiums?
Dennis can talk that **** because he has the resources. If Sauber spent within a profit model like Macca does, they'd be outside the 107% rule.
Last edited: