Dingusberry
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 1,009
- Reaction score
- 58
****, ****, ****! I can't return it because I used a proxy to buy it
NOOO.
NOOO.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
****, ****, ****! I can't return it because I used a proxy to buy it
NOOO.
If you have a 42" chest, I'd go with the 42R. You won't want to feel constricted in your upper arms.
If this is helpful, the p2p on a 40R is 21.25". The wool on this coat is very thick--noticeably more than on the Vintage.
The p2p on my 1949 Vintage 38R is 19.25".
Keep in mind that the Mil-Spec is a working man's coat. It is the Carhartt of peacoats.
Are you serious? I think the arms are too long, but that's not a huge problem, isn't it?You know, the more I look at the pictures, the more I think it is close to a perfect fit.
Liking the thick wool - this will be a winter coat in Maryland so bring on the cold.
Thanks, the p2p you gave on the 40R would be quite tight for me - given that the chest size (p2p 23") on the medium Bayswater I tried on was only slightly roomy, I think a p2p of 21" would be pushing it. Liking the thick wool - this will be a winter coat in Maryland so bring on the cold.
If I recall, you sent a peacoat back to Sterlingwear - may I ask how much return shipping usually runs?