- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 28,791
- Reaction score
- 37,911
Given the massive weight of the car, it probably chews through tires every 5k miles.
Last edited:
UNIFORM LA Japanese BDU Camo Cargo Pants Drop, going on right now.
Uniform LA's Japanese BDU Camo Cargo Pants are now live. These cargos are based off vintage US Army BDU (Battle Dress Uniform) cargos. They're made of a premium 13.5-ounce Japanese twill that has been sulfur dyed for a vintage look. Every detail has been carried over from the inspiration and elevated. Available in two colorways, tundra and woodland. Please find them here
Good luck!.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Given the massive weight of the car, it probably chews through tires every 5k miles.
About time they redesign the thing but this suffers from a lot of the same problems their other body on frame SUVs do. Excessively poor packaging and 4 cylinder engines that disappoint the diehards and don’t really bring that much of an improvement in fuel economy.
The interior is modernized, but the second row is smaller than before, doesn’t fold flat and the rear cargo load floor is high AF. That was a problem on the Sequoia too due to the hybrid mechanicals.
And then of course there is the mid 90’s Isuzu vibes with the exterior.
I don't get this either - if you're doing smaller displacement, why is the fuel economy so bad? (and if its not improving MPGs, why do it)4 cylinder engines that disappoint the diehards and don’t really bring that much of an improvement in fuel economy.
About time they redesign the thing but this suffers from a lot of the same problems their other body on frame SUVs do. Excessively poor packaging and 4 cylinder engines that disappoint the diehards and don’t really bring that much of an improvement in fuel economy.
The interior is modernized, but the second row is smaller than before, doesn’t fold flat and the rear cargo load floor is high AF. That was a problem on the Sequoia too due to the hybrid mechanicals.
And then of course there is the mid 90’s Isuzu vibes with the exterior.
I don't get this either - if you're doing smaller displacement, why is the fuel economy so bad? (and if its not improving MPGs, why do it)
Current 4Runner is like $40k up to like $55k for the top level while LC starts at $56k up to about $75k for the First Edition. I'm guessing starting trim for the new 4runner will be like $43k going up to like $60k. Not too much overlap.I think the new 4Runner looks nice but it’s hard to see where it fits in the lineup. Same engine as the Land Cruiser? Will pricing overlap?
I’d have given it a different powertrain and priced it well under the Land Cruiser.
Thank god you can remove that black front lip. It looks ugly AF. I wish they did the TOYOTA script vs the logo.Per Superfast Matt's video, the raised cargo floor is for the hybrid's high-voltage battery, and it isn't there in the non-hybrid model. Also, you don't have to get the black fender blisters:
Lol, obviously. I'm never going off-roading or plan on hauling anything.I feel compelled to note that almost no one here should buy any of these Toyota trucks based on their actual usages of their cars. You’re all too old for cosplay.
I feel compelled to note that almost no one here should buy any of these Toyota trucks based on their actual usages of their cars. You’re all too old for cosplay.