Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I

[Manton]

Originally Posted by rach2jlc

You know somebody's not all there when he puts AF and matt together in the same group, and calls me a self-loathing gay who disagrees with Democrat talking points because I believe myself to be sick and immoral.

I believe all this too, does that mean I am crazy?

 

[AThingForCashmere]

Originally Posted by Bhowie

What you said was way out of line
Explain why? And it's ok for him to call me a fascist?

 

[MrG]

Originally Posted by Bhowie

What you said was way out of line

+1

I've learned to find amusement with, rather than be bothered by, AT4A2M's trolling. Now I just laugh at his posts without comment and jab back only when he addresses me directly. However, the way he's been getting on Rach, the self-loathing comment in particular, is wholly inappropriate.

 

[AThingForCashmere]

Originally Posted by MrG

+1 I've learned to find amusement with, rather than be bothered by, AT4A2M's trolling. Now I just laugh at his posts without comment and jab back only when he addresses me directly. However, the way he's been getting on Rach, the self-loathing comment in particular, is wholly inappropriate.
Pile on, people, Pile on!

 

[rach2jlc]

Lest we forget this is the poster who brought us these gems:

Originally Posted by AThingForCashmere

No, that's Brit Hume. Just take one look at him. He's an utterly tortured soul, pretending to be someone he's not. For money. And now, thanks to the suicide of his son, he's found Jesus. When your father is the personification of pure evil, it's not hard to take a rifle to your head.

Originally Posted by Artisan Fan

That's a new low, even for you.

Originally Posted by AThingForCashmere

What's low about it? Like I said, just take a good look at Hume sometime. His eyes, his demeanor, his body language etc. The man is desperately unhappy. I sincerely hope he decides to grow a pair and stops prostituting himself to people he finds repugnant.

 

[robin]

 

[RJman]

Originally Posted by Manton

I believe all this too, does that mean I am crazy?

I miss you. (no ****)

 

[AThingForCashmere]

Originally Posted by rach2jlc

I explained clearly why the word was appropriate, given the type of views you support and how you go about articulating them.
And I explained why I believe the term self-loathing is appropriate for you, given your refusal to condemn a political party who's trying to take your rights away. What's the difference?

 

[Douglas]

Originally Posted by AThingForCashmere

Pile on, people, Pile on!

How feverishly are you clicking refresh, and, do you have ********* out and in your hand?

 

[lawyerdad]

Originally Posted by Manton

I believe all this too, does that mean I am crazy?

Would you settle for being an idiot?

 

[Bhowie]

 

[AThingForCashmere]

Look rach, I promised to leave you alone and I meant that.

Don't goad me and I won't goad back.

 

[Bhowie]

Originally Posted by AThingForCashmere

Look rach, I promised to leave you alone and I meant that.

Don't goad me and I won't goad back.

Your comment was the equivalent of punching someone and running away.

 

[AThingForCashmere]

Originally Posted by Bhowie

Your comment was the equivalent of punching someone and running away.
Rach started the name calling, not me.

 

[rach2jlc]

Originally Posted by AThingForCashmere

Rach started the name calling, not me.
Here is exactly what I said, so people can see how nonsensical all of this is:

You really deny choice in your stances, presenting a single viewpoint from which deviation, discussion, or alteration is impossible. You present the most classically fascist viewpoint I've ever read on this forum. It's fascinating and frightening at the same time.

Originally Posted by AThingForCashmere

Look rach, I promised to leave you alone and I meant that. Don't goad me and I won't goad back.
Your basic offer here is, "As long as nobody challenges or questions my nonsensical trollish rambling about political matters, then I won't resort to unfounded personal attacks and beyond-the-pale assertions." And I don't even mean just with me; you got put on timeout for doing this before in a way that was truly reprehensible (the Brit Hume thread.) As well, every poster in every thread who disagrees with you is immediately attacked. Look up what fascism actually means and you'll see that my earlier attribution was spot-on. Perhaps your heart IS in the right place in wanting to right what you see as the wrongs of Republicanism, but sadly, you represent wholly everything you despise. This is my last post on the topic in this thread.