• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • Hi, we have updated our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy in anticipation of the upcoming new Calfornia laws, the CCPA. If you are a resident of California, these rights pertain to you. Thanks - Styleforum Team.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Thoughts on burnishing...

EvanTheMenace

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
All,

Wanted to start a conversation around burnishing and get everyone's take. For whatever reason, I'm not a huge fan of burnishing. I'm in the market for a pair of leather double monk's and went to Leffot today with the intention of purchasing the below pair of Edward Green Westminsters. From the pictures online, I did not notice the rather strong burnishing on the toes and when I tried them on, although they felt great and are undoubtedly beautiful, I just couldn't justify the investment for a shoe that I don't absolutely love (also didn't realize how square the toe is, which I also don't love). Frankly, I don't know how to articulate why I don't love burnishing, I just can't help feeling that way. I guess I feel like these Westminsters would look more classic without it and that burnishing in general is a bit too aggressive. I know that this is a sweeping - and likely wrong - generalization but I feel that burnishing can be a means for shoemakers to try to make their products look more quality/attractive/trendy than they are.... a way to cover up and compensate for a lesser product. Perhaps I feel that without burnishing, the leather is truly naked and has to stand on it's own. Obviously EG leather, and the general product, is of the highest quality but I just feel that it cheapens the shoe - or at least looks that way... perhaps it's from my poorer days looking at Aldo or DSW shoes covered in burnishing but I just can't shake my distaste for it.

Interested to hear if I'm in the minority here and how people generally feel about burnishing.

Look forward to it.

And BTW - decided to go for a bit cheaper pair of Carminas on the Inca last. Also considered William II's but am going to save my big purchase for a pair of MTO EG Arlington's in tobacco suede later this year. Those are what the kids call, the bomb.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How wide do you like your leg opening on your trousers?

  • 7”

    Votes: 52 16.8%
  • 7.5”

    Votes: 106 34.3%
  • 8”

    Votes: 92 29.8%
  • 8.5”

    Votes: 34 11.0%
  • 9”

    Votes: 12 3.9%
  • 9.5”

    Votes: 7 2.3%
  • 10”

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • 10.5”

    Votes: 5 1.6%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
432,109
Messages
9,269,415
Members
194,594
Latest member
lust4thrive
Top