LabelKing
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- May 24, 2002
- Messages
- 25,421
- Reaction score
- 268
I agree, it is best to say "No" to these archaic letterings, which only confuse without shedding full spectrum light on any important or relevant phenomona. While it is often admirable to cherish and exalt the past -- to preserve the best that has been thought, seen, said, and regurgitated -- nonetheless, to vomit up obscure references only in the attempt to impress upon others the extent of one's pedantry, or at least mastery of Wikipedia, lacks something of the soigne and is, in the last anaylsis, rather vulgar.Originally Posted by Manton
But where would your circa 1898 London be without a little imagination, the hobby-store and a whole lot of wikipedia/conservapedia pictures?