dddrees
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 9,323
- Reaction score
- 1,605
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
excellentI forgot to post these. I just received these a few weeks ago.
Thank you sir.excellent
^ The design of that shoe, with the little strip of canvas between two pieces of leather at a place on the shoes that is subject to considerable flexing just screams "failure mode". How long before that canvas strip is worn through? Not very long, I would imagine.
Don't see why it'd be any weaker than the same point on a canvas plimsoll. It looks to me like the whole vamp has a canvas layer, and then the leather toecap and the apron across the mid-vamp are laid over that. Could be wrong, though.
I was speculating that the canvas would be a weak point in that mid vamp area because it is a narrow strip placed between two pieces of leather. I am assuming that the canvas is weaker and more flexible than the leather. This would have the effect of transferring all of the flex to that strip of canvas while the leather stays fairly rigid and unflexed with each step the wearer takes. And so it would quickly break down under the stress.
The difference with the plimsoll is the absence of those two pieces of leather to act as friction points. I, also, could be wrong, though. I must also disclose that I think the shoes themselves are not very attractive and I would not be a customer, as much as I love spectator shoes. So there's probably some sort of cognitive bias in my argument, somewhere!