veeevo
Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2009
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
Perkins is a better defender than Wallace. Perkins is only 25 years old and Wallace is 35 years old. Perkins can body anyone on the key, he did well against Howard in the playoffs. Dude hustles a lot too. Wallace is unpredictable, you'll never know which Wallace will show up. In offense, sure I'll pick Wallace but on defense, I'll stick to Perkins.
+1
I was really impressed with the way he defended howard on many key possesions, but for now with Wallace's IQ + experience i'm gonna give the edge to wallace + he can stroke the 3 for a big.