Math Problem taking the Internet by storm

[tagutcow]

IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later. I AGREE

TIP: to embed Youtube clips, put only the encoded part of the Youtube URL, e.g. eBGIQ7ZuuiU between the tags.

 

[KitAkira]

This threak delivers! Even use of "irregardless" (why the hell isn't that caught on my spellcheck?).

Also, there is only one possible answer.

 

[in stitches]

Originally Posted by KitAkira

This threak delivers! Even use of "irregardless" (why the hell isn't that caught on my spellcheck?).

Also, there is only one possible answer.

c'mon - dont be shy, tell us how you solved it.

 

[KitAkira]

Originally Posted by in stitches

c'mon - dont be shy, tell us how you solved it.
I shouldn't humour you, but
48÷2(9+3) = 2 or 288 Break it into basic components
And x(y) is always considered the same as x * y, don't know why anyone's arguing that nonsense; distribution of x into y makes no sense because distribution is a multiplication property and order of operations states that solving within parentheses takes precedence over multiplication; and something outside the parentheses is not "attached" in any way, lest it would have been nested in another set of parentheses
48 * (2^-1) * (9+3) If that division sign bothers you so much, convert it into multiplication of the reciprocal 48 * (.5) * (12) Solve within the parentheses 24 * 12 Multiply left to right 288

 

[in stitches]

Originally Posted by KitAkira

I shouldn't humour you, but
48÷2(9+3) = 2 or 288
Break it into basic components
And x(y) is always considered the same as x * y, don't know why anyone's arguing that nonsense; distribution of x into y makes no sense because distribution is a multiplication property and order of operations states that solving within parentheses takes precedence over multiplication; and something outside the parentheses is not "attached" in any way, lest it would have been nested in another set of parentheses


48 * (2^-1) * (9+3)
If that division sign bothers you so much, convert it into multiplication of the reciprocal

48 * (.5) * (12)
Solve within the parentheses

24 * 12
Multiply left to right

288


you should always humor me, its well worth it. glad to see i got the same answer you did

 

[Fuuma]

Originally Posted by gfreeman

You're right; it's an noun adjunct. But it does modify (or can be interpreted to modify, which is why it's a poorly-constructed sentence as it invites ambiguity) the second noun, which in this case is "murderer." Adjectival noun/noun adjuncts function in the same way as proper adjectives (and by that I don't mean proper nouns converted into proper adjectives)... in this case it's kind of vague, yes, but the way I described it isn't technically wrong.

Language invites ambiguity.

 

[StephenHero]

So, that settles it. The answer is 2.

 

[freshandope]

yeah this isn't even a math problem. just a matter of where the 2nd part of the equation is. and if it was written out as if it is like on the computer, then answer is 288

 

[pebblegrain]

I'm pretty sure it's actually ASSDEM, not PEMDAS

 

[misnomer]

bad notation

 

[Stewbone]

vote for 2