• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Historic Shoes

robdpittman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
Something that just came to mind when watching a film about the 1930's;

Back then, and since days well before, even low-grade shoes were made by hand and had leather soles. Yes, they may not have been well-fitted, the stitching might have been shoddy, they probably used poor quality leathers and more than likely they offered little in the way of support or protection for the foot.

But, were there any good, inexpensive shoes in those days, and if so, what were they? Are any of the artisans we look to in modern times the sup-par hacks of yesteryear, who have simply improved their craft over time? What were the old equivalents of Clarks, Rockport and Hush Puppies?
 

MyOtherLife

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
6,468
Reaction score
522
I'll fill in until the heavyweights arrive..
This is a massive topic, and sub-categories underneath it are the ongoing subject of countless threads on the forum here.
High end shoes today are employing very similar, if not the same methods commonly used in the 1930's.
All that hand work costs $$$. This level of workmanship is still very much appreciated and sought after among shoe afficiados today.
Browse Google images for shoes of that period and you'll be quite suprised how advanced footwear was.
We are still wearing the same shoe styles today, amazingly. They are timeless.
In fact, you could even go back to the 1700's and see shoe masterpieces in developed countries,
albeit for the aristocracy...but it did exist.
In other words, they certainly did know what they were doing back then.
The leathers were vegetable tanned and the craftsmanship was all there.
A pair of American made Florsheim Kenmoors in the 1930's, if I remember right, would have been between $4-$6.
Had they maintained that level of quality today, the same pair would be $400-600 and up.
As to your question of low-end (your list of Clarks, Rockport and Hush Puppies?)
The 'sub-par hacks' I don't think existed in the 1930's (maybe they did, but I'm too young to know)
Sub-par hacks can be found in 90% of todays footwear. (No Croc's in the 1930's)
In the 1930's, the mentality was very different...do it right, or don't do it at all.
Shoes were handed down from older brother to younger; father to son, etc.
They would be mended so many times you couldn't tell which leather was the original and which were the patches. They were not a disposable society. Things were built to last.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 97 36.9%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 94 35.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 32 12.2%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 44 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 40 15.2%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,483
Messages
10,596,498
Members
224,440
Latest member
lokeshnirhu
Top