aybojs
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2002
- Messages
- 947
- Reaction score
- 2
The basis of all pointless arguments-scramble for any reason to justify your original position regardless of whether that was the reason for your original decision.Originally Posted by Nonk
Regardless of you unfortunate heritage if it takes you several extra minutes to thread a belt, perhaps you are the marsupial?
No, you are quite clearly the marsupial.
First off, you make an obnoxiously grandstanding claim about there being only one absolutely correct way to thread a belt, with the implication that any other practitioner is acting out of ignorance and ineptitude, with there being no possible justification for anything to be right. Note that my original "marsupial" remark only targeted people who had a stick immersed far enough up their asses to carry such an attitude seriously, not people who practiced differently than I. Futhermore, I offered a legitimate and logical argument justifying my own personal practices from an efficiency standpoint: the observation that it is substantially quicker for me to thread my belt in a way that is conducive to my hand dominance, backed by the observation that my doing so has never been enough of an issue to induce hostile reactions in any sane person that has seen my technique.
You, on the other hand, only offer some flimsy evidence based entirely on your ethnocentric biases and applying to a very limited few. I am not a citizen of the UK. I have never lived in the UK. I have no immediate British heritage (with no disrespect to lovely Great Britain, thanks for being a racist ass and implying that anyone who doesn't have John Bull's blood is some creature of "unfortunate" and inferior existence). I have never served in the military in any capacity, nor do I intend to do so. I would reckon that a majority of the board's membership, and certainly a majority of the citizens of the U.S., where this forum is based, fit the same bill. So why exactly does your example of the lofted British army have any relevance at all? Please do explain this, because right now your holier-than-thou example has as much weight as I would if I were to say that the choice of the brother-in-law of the best friend of Chief Ooga Booga of some random Bantu tribe in western Malawi to wear his ceremonial leopard skin belt clockwise meant that every single person who didn't do so was ignorant and wrong.
The funny thing is that I actually know quite a bit about British military history, especially considering that one of my last college papers traced the development of the New Model Army and the progression of Parliamentarian military organization and tactics from the time of the indecisive Battle of Edgehill to victory in the First Civil War at Naseby. Suprisingly enough, I never in any of my studies encountered any sources enlightening me on how the direction of the soldiers' belt threading was a historically significant tradition that factored into the identity and success of the army. I realize this will fall on deaf ears since I'm talking to someone who couldn't distinguish the Battle of Dettingen from the siege of Drogheda or Thomas Fairfax from Thomas Gage, but suffice it to say that none of the English/British history scholars (and natives) I've studied under, who would certainly far outclass you in knowledge of British military history, have ever emphasized the sheer importance of belt-threading direction among British military leaders. I'm just dying to see you send me a JSTOR link where I can find a series of enlightening scholarly articles on how the choice of British soldiers to thread their belts the proper, counter-clockwise way marks the nation's greatest military innovation since the use of longbows at Crecy.
Anyways, to finish my highly sarcastic and pretentious post (duly in rebuttal to a post of similar style), I will cite Oliver Wendell Holmes' quote, "It is revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law than that so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV." Certainly, you have offered no better reason, whereas my argument of making the matter of belt direction a choice dependent on individual expediency and practicality has. Therefore, I'm well-justified in my choice, and so is anyone who threads his belt counter-clockwise because it is more efficient for him to do so. So, in conclusion, go *************.
To J et al.: apologies for dragging this out further, but darn it, I just got back from off a rough day of work and couldn't let this insult go unanswered. Please go easy on me, I'll stay out of this moribund thread from now on.