STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
What is the general consensus on fairly young people wearing Alden shoes? Do Alden shoes on the feet of a guy in his 20s seem out of place? What about the classic Alden Tassel loafer?
The Alden Fan shoes would look fine on the 20-something set - especially the chukkas or the square toed blucher.What is the general consensus on fairly young people wearing Alden shoes? Do Alden shoes on the feet of a guy in his 20s seem out of place? What about the classic Alden Tassel loafer?
Some people here might disagree but the classic shoes are basically the same no matter were you get them, from a design. The Allen Edmonds Park Avenue, which I am wearing right now, is no different from thw C&J Whitehall or whatever the equivelant Alden shoe is from an asthetic point of view. Obviously, quality is another story.Alden classic dress shoes are, well, classic dress shoes, suitable for all ages.
As a shoe aficionado, I strongly disagree. Ironically, I find that the characteristics in build quality that separate Aldens or the Allen Edmonds Park Ave. from a Lobb or Green is less bothersome than the difference in aesthetics. For example, let's examine captoe oxfords--a quinessential staple in a man's wardrobe. The first example I recalled was the John Lobb Phillip II from the Classics collections, but I can't find a pictures. So here is a close approximation from an A Harris auction: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws....27&rd=1 Note the bootmaker sole and toe shape among other details. Now compare the previous shoe with a similar model from Alden: http://www.aldenshoe.com/cat_ane2_c906.htm I had the opportunity not long ago to buy the black version of this shoe, brand new, for just a tad under $100 + tax. Although the Aldens were really comfortable, I'd rather pay a tad more for an English shoe that's leagues ahead of the Alden in terms of aesthetics.Some people here might disagree but the classic shoes are basically the same no matter were you get them, from a design. The Allen Edmonds Park Avenue, which I am wearing right now, is no different from thw C&J Whitehall or whatever the equivelant Alden shoe is from an asthetic point of view. Obviously, quality is another story
Keep in mind the traditional Alden penny loafer gained currency as a campus shoe worn by the younger set.
Alden classic dress shoes are, well, classic dress shoes, suitable for all ages.
Not as cool as a pair of Ludwig Reiter trainers or Berluti wholecuts, but
they can still look cool with jeans and a distressed cord blazer.
Tassel shoes were stylish as part of the full Brooks Brothers natural shoulder "uniform" of the '50s and '60s for college-aged men. Almost universal in some circles (see Ken Pollock's posts on "Ask Andy" and look at Cary Grant's cordovan tassel shoes in "To Catch a Thief". But I agree that this is history. I don't see these shoes ever worn by men in their 20's and, if it's not worn at all, it's not stylish. Not to offend the entire American Trad wing of these forums, I was sitting at an outdoor restaurant this September on the east side of New York and saw a young man in his '20's walk right by in white bucks, blue seersucker suit, white buttondown shirt, bow tie, and  straw boater hat with grosgrain ribbon. He stood out. My wife asked me if men still wore these clothes. I had to say no (I thought it would have been stylish 40 years ago, before the hippies). P.S. All you guys complain about "American Trad" on "Ask Andy"-but everyone's posting on Alden on this forum too.Alden shoes, while undoubtedly well made, are never, have never been, stylish.