• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Fabio Borrelli

Soph

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
4,006
Reaction score
13
Originally Posted by iammatt
What did Despos think of the guy who is about to bust his front button?

I don't want to speak for him, but I don't think his impression was favorable
wink.gif
 

neyus

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
635
Reaction score
6
Originally Posted by Soph
I would completely agree. This jacket is too tight as there is alot of pulling in the midsection even at a standard relaxed position. Fabio is dead on it fit, closeness but not pulling.

Pants cut much wider on Fabio would look incorrect with his jacket. At first glace, it is easy especially in the US to look and say that's too narrow, but upon looking at it over time, it's quite a studied look.

Then again, the US is hardly the leader in elegant, good looking menswear.lol


I agree the jacket is too tight. I like the look of the pants. I think with narrow pants you can afford to make the length a little shorter.
 

neyus

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
635
Reaction score
6
iammatt said:
Just for reference, this is a jacket and pants that are too tight. Frankly, they look like crap to me. It is kind of amusing to read all of the gushing comments by Sartorialist readers:

Cuff.jpg


Looking at the photo again. The fit looks nice on one side of him (his left, our right). The other side is pulling.
 

nioh

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
698
Reaction score
2
Fabio rocks the perfect trouser length. Looks smashing.
 

Richieg

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by Soph
I'd have to agree, I was studing this this afternoon with Despos, and Fabio would do better with a bit fuller pants and slightly less narrow to balance the jacket's a bit more broader appearance. I think a 15.5 to 16 inch hem circumference would suit him better.
Are you having something made by Despos?
 

Cambion

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I just purchased a really nice Borrelli suit at Filene's Basement. Brought it by Rizzo Tailoring in Harvard Square. Joe Caluti recognized it as a Borrelli without seeing the labels (apparently the chest pocket is a very distinctive shape). In deciding a hem length he told me that it is actually the traditional Neopolitan style to have the very narrow tapered trousers hemmed longer, rather than shorter. After looking at it both ways in the mirror, I would tend to agree.
 

Naturlaut II

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
488
Reaction score
6
Originally Posted by Soph
2r70yn9.jpg


The body looks fine, the trousers looks fine, the button stance appears fine, and the ensemble looks fine. The jacket is RTW and not made for him, right? I mean, there's too much creasing on the sleeves, and perhaps they are too long - that would explain the awkward hand pose. I do share the same likes for fitted shirt cuffs though - I dislike shirt cuffs that are inches wider than the actual wrists. The lapels could be 1/4" to 3/8" narrower if it's bespoke - now the body looks too wide for the slim pants.

Just my observations ...
 

itsstillmatt

The Liberator
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
13,969
Reaction score
2,086
Originally Posted by Naturlaut II
The body looks fine, the trousers looks fine, the button stance appears fine, and the ensemble looks fine. The jacket is RTW and not made for him, right? I mean, there's too much creasing on the sleeves, and perhaps they are too long - that would explain the awkward hand pose. I do share the same likes for fitted shirt cuffs though - I dislike shirt cuffs that are inches wider than the actual wrists. The lapels could be 1/4" to 3/8" narrower if it's bespoke - now the body looks too wide for the slim pants.

Just my observations ...

I think that Naturlaut has it right, although I doubt the suit is RTW. Remember, Fabio is a pretty big guy through the chest, so the jacket is not going to be tiny. Nobody who dresses well wears that awful tiny jacket stuff anyway. THe lapels are a little wide for my taste, but not terrible.
 

style alphabet

New Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I disagree, I think the pleated pants/trousers that he's wearing are spot on. It's a studied look, why would he make a sartorial mistake?
Yes, the trousers could have been a quarter of an inch further down to elongate his legs and not as narrow on the ankle BUT this is HIS style. This is part of his idiosyncratic style and it gives him a less formal/conservative look.

http://www.stylealphabet.com
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 95 38.0%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 91 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.8%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 16.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.2%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,098
Messages
10,593,720
Members
224,356
Latest member
Illuminatiagentug
Top