Creepy Sartorial Images

[RJman]

Originally Posted by mafoofan

It's "conceptual art, deconstruction and happenings . . . applied on people" if you want to see it that way. Now, that doesn't necessarily destroy any artistic merit it might have, but you can't so readily dismiss the limitations of your own perspective and bias.

I know, I know--I'm not from the background you'd consider worthy of judging Margiela. However, that doesn't really matter does it? I could say the same about you and Rubinacci with equal validation. That's why I think it's pointless to judge an opinion by the person who speaks it. Hell, for all you know, being an outsider just means I'm seeing things more clearly.

Consider the source.

 

[Doxe]

Let's keep the pics to SF.

Anyone have a copy of the pic of Randallr where he was passed out drunk on Socal's couch?

IIRC, there was an allegation of photoshopping, as well as the photo being taken without permission. It therefore has all the necessary elements of a "creepy sartorial image".

 

[amerikajinda]

 

[amerikajinda]

 

[idfnl]

 

[acidboy]

 

[Sanguis Mortuum]

Originally Posted by idfnl

(McQueen, Fall '09)

 

[voxsartoria]

- B

 

[RJman]

Originally Posted by voxsartoria

- B

WTH?

 

[lasbar]

Originally Posted by amerikajinda

Gary Glitter ...A man we can trust as long as he doesn't babysit one of our kids...

 

[voxsartoria]

Originally Posted by RJman

WTH?

- B

 

[onix]

Originally Posted by voxsartoria

- B

The pants were not being worn in the picture. I bet Vox did it himself.

 

[Mannix]

Originally Posted by onix

The pants were not being worn in the picture. I bet Vox did it himself.

Vox doesn't do anything himself, he had one of his minions do it.

 

[voxsartoria]

Originally Posted by Mannix

Vox doesn't do anything himself, he had one of his minions do it.

Interesting theory.


- B

 

[blofeld]