dirk diggler
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2006
- Messages
- 1,569
- Reaction score
- 2
$20 says Jill takes to internet stripping when this "relaunch" fails
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Now we're talking... this is a language Jill and Chuck will surely understand. Vote with your dollars. Are you willing to pay for their merchandise? What is it worth? List those ties on Buying and Selling and let's see if anyone is willing to pay. They say they are eschewing the drama on the fora. Fine! Let's let the market decide - yay or nay?
Why in the world would anyone buy from CF when you have Sam Hober, Fourinhand, Drakes London, Howard Yount, etc. all providing much less gaudy and better quality ties for cheaper prices?
More than anything, the disqualifier for me is the stupid name.
Although I have a somewhat dim view of how well the ties have held up over time, I must admit I'm mystified by this criticism. Sure, some of the Carlo Franco offerings are more vibrant than your garden variety cravat, but many (stripes and pindots, for example) are perfectly at home in a restrained outfit. Each of the ties I purchased worked very well in a five-day-a-week work environment.
...because with CF you have the added bonus of excitement in not knowing whether you will get the tie.
pretty much how I feel. I've met Jill and Chuck, they are nice enough people. I have 4 of their ties. one is probrably my favorite tie, one I never wear because it is just too thick. the other 2 are pretty nice. I like Sam Hober ties a lot more, better value.As per my previous post, I personally am a satisfied customer, but having seen 'where the hell is my tie' posts on here for the past two years - and indeed being one of the people that defended you guys for a long time in those posts - I think you do have a lot to answer for. So, when people who are aggrieved and were around at the time, have legitimate gripes and cautionary tales, then I am gonna let them stand.
Very well said.
Does anyone really believe that Audrey was for real?????
Were you around back then?
Now we're talking... this is a language Jill and Chuck will surely understand. Vote with your dollars. Are you willing to pay for their merchandise? What is it worth? List those ties on Buying and Selling and let's see if anyone is willing to pay. They say they are eschewing the drama on the fora. Fine! Let's let the market decide - yay or nay?
I dont see how the secondary market has any bearing here. The discussion here is about honouring previous sales and trust in customer service, not the inherant attributes of the product. They sold a product. People here (in particular) had a free choice to buy or not to buy it. Whether it was SF approved or represented good value is not relevant. What is relevant is whether they fulfilled on whatever promises were made. Let's not pile on other stuff. K
The Audrey issue was that she started a 'im here, the world makes sense again' thread, a bunch of upset customer jumped in and said 'where's my tie', and a pile on ensued. Then a couple of 'leave Audrey alone, CF stuff is great and I'm the happiest customer in the world' posts appeared from a brand-spanking-newb, so I used my mod powers and IP checked it and guess what, it was the same IP as.............Audrey.
Jill has articulated her intention to come clean, do the right thing, avoid the drama, conduct business in a business like fashion.