STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I've had similar experiences in my family in France, and it's usually older family members. You typically are expected to protest, which makes the person insist and feel even better about winning the "argument".this reminds me of a funny thing that happened to me last year. I met one of my wife's family members, who I had only seen our wedding. He is about 65, the husband of my wife's grandfather's niece - that is considered close family in the colombian jewish comunity. nice enough guy, relativly successful, very comfortable. anyway, when we met, he shook my hand and left me a "tip" - $60 folded up in his hand the same way I might tip a maitre d. he said something like "please get something for your son from me". I was pretty austonded, a little offended but very amused. I have never been "tipped" before.
You assume that those who have money or "earn it" and "achieve financial success" do it solely on their own merits. Conversely, those who hold your view also (and this is the nasty side of a meritocracy) believe that those who haven't any money, haven't any because they haven't "worked hard". So it's the fault of the poor that they are poor.
Your argument would seem to allow (and even to argue that it's right) that the poor are poor and the rich are rich. It's a very pernicious middle-class, pull 'em up by their bootstraps argument. The idea that some stock-jobber on Wall Street (and I used to be one of them) or some guy who owns a chain of dry cleaners or pizza parlors is more deserving of material wealth than a woman on welfare who is raising four children, a janitor cleaning a building, a police officer, or anyone else is not something I agree with.
I don't know, why don't you read your last full sentence that I cited. Do I have to parse out the convolluted and contradictory statement (and it's suppositions) for you, or can you figure it out on your own?
I don't like talking about money, I get a creepy feeling of bad taste: but I'll be blunt: I grew up with a lot of money. I also made (and make) a fair amount of my own. And yet, I was told as a young man, and I still believe it today: when you see a street person shuffling down the sidewalk, never think you are better than he is. Know that, there but for the grace of God go I. The idea that you think it's okay that some people aren't entitled to a living wage is beyond the pale. It's so wrong I don't know what to say. It's also a fairly common thought in Bush's America though, isn't it? In fact, it's not even Bush, as I'd wager it's a common American sentiment that transcends a specific party and a specific time. But it's heartless and it's disgusting. Your argument on the whole has been predicated on many pernicious fallacies. One of them is that one person's success is achieved at the expense of others. And you are actually right that this is the way it works. But you are wrong to think it necessary or good.
If they were good people, it would make them feel bad about not leaving a tip. If they do it again, that should be the last time she goes out with them, if feasible. I don't have office 'colleagues' so I don't know what it would be like really, but if it were my friends I would call them on it politely. As to the cafeteria with bus service, I sometimes leave a dollar on the table, but it is always awkward. Some places, you don't want to leave money lying around, so it seems no tip is necessary. It's just a ball of confusion. And to the living wage argument, there are good economic reasons why every job should not (cannot) pay a 'living wage'. Ideally, it would work out that way. But there is not enough wealth without serious socialistic restructuring to make it possible. There are people who can live just fine and work a non-living-wage job. These are kids still under their parents' care and e.g. wives of a 'sole breadwinner' type husband (or husbands of wives, whatever). Paying these jobs less than a living wage is not unfair if society works the way it is supposed to, i.e. in Leave it to Beaver. Slight sarcasm, but you get what I mean. Just as crappy clothes in childhood build character in children, crappy conditions with the promise of better life promote innovation in society.Moral dilema: My mother goes out to lunch with her office colleagues. However, they don't leave a tip so my mother did. Does everybody think this was proper, where she covered for everybody else's tip as well. I understand why she did this, but I think it set up a bad precedent where nobody will ever leave a tip because they will expect her to cover it. And, I'm dissappointed nobody answered J's question about what to tip at a place like soup plantation where you are responsible for getting your own food, but yet there's a busboy who cleans away the dishes. Should the tip therefore be less than the standard 15%, more like 10%.