sterlingindigo
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
- Messages
- 3,032
- Reaction score
- 10,396
Wish I could have got in on this brown shell Mac MTO.Brown Shell GMTO Mac’s today
View attachment 931847
LuxeSwap Auctions will be ending soon!
LuxeSwap is the original consignor for Styleforum, and has weekly auctions that show the diversity of our community, with hundreds lof starting at $0.99 every week, ending starting at 5:30 Eastern Time. Please take the time to check them out here. You may find something that fits your wardrobe exactly
Good luck!.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Wish I could have got in on this brown shell Mac MTO.Brown Shell GMTO Mac’s today
View attachment 931847
Someone else mentioned light grey pants, which I agree with but I really wouldn’t recommend a Walnut captoe. If color matching is important (which I find annoying if you don’t have people in tuxedos, black shoes or you aren’t providing shoes as groomsman gifts) and you need to go the walnut route then the strand, Cornwallis, McAllister, or the Indy line versions of them are the best option IMO. Walnut is informal and so is heavy brogue. If he has you in blue suits and tan colored shoes and the wedding is outdoors then I wouldn’t be worried about any kind of formality. To me the walnut captoe doesn’t make any sense as even though it is a plain cap it is still walnut and will always be informal. If you had a giant shoe collection then yea whatever who cares but if you plan to use them regularly then I’d avoid that particular combination for now.
Received these Fifth Avenue Seconds today. I like the fit and shape much better than the Hopkinson. The defect is the size of the cap which is not the same on both shoes. I noticed it almost immediately but my wife didn't notice when I asked her to spot the defect. Would you keep or return? The anniversary sale is coming up in April. Assuming these are $150 off I could get first quality for $275 in April, plus the $25 restocking fee I'd pay for returning these, so $300 compared to the $249 I paid for these. I have a feeling this defect is going to drive me nuts. Pics below.
Where do you get a haircut on a Sunday?
If you’re going to hunt shark, you’re going to need a bigger boat.There we go! Those have eluded me over the years but the hunt continues. Not my favorite shoe for shark but that is what's out there.
I still have multiple Maxfield’s and a Grayson. Hancock long gone for poor fit.https://issuu.com/allenedmonds/docs/shoewrap---spring-2005/6
Top 20 selling AE shoes from 2005 era.
How does this list stand up to forum members interests? How many of these do you own or the current very near equivalent.
Chocolate brown Elys today as I sit out front while the kid rides the bike. A smoldering 85 right now - summer is here already. Ready to give up the winter yet @danwatts2005 ?
View attachment 931873
According to WTForecast here is what they say about the weather here.
View attachment 931876
View attachment 931683
What is your limiter in the 65? Toe box? I have the same situation at 11 - D is too tight in the toes so I have to go to 11E (I get too much heel slip with 11.5D). My natty shell strands are 11D and are perfect - shell is sometimes lasted a little looser.
Also, green would be a great complement to mid grey or browns. Also, pretty much all tweeds ....
View attachment 931687