• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Brei

Status
Not open for further replies.

Keith T

TWAT Master.
Joined
Apr 17, 2004
Messages
1,847
Reaction score
1,465
Vintage for me today:

IMAG0112.jpg
 

Keith T

TWAT Master.
Joined
Apr 17, 2004
Messages
1,847
Reaction score
1,465
Also, for the record, I love my 39mm Explorer. Most people pick nits about the too-short hands (way, way overstated IMO) and while I do understand some of the hate about the rehaut on all of the new Rolex models, again IMO it's pretty darn subtle when compared to a lot of modern branding.

For me, the watch has a nice balance, I like the EXPLORER being moved to the bottom of the dial, and thank God and baby Jesus that they did not polish any links on it.
 

Dino944

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
7,733
Reaction score
8,748
Quote:
I think having tudor allows rolex more flexibility in terms of marketing. As much as I complain that Rolex is lazy/boring, I also understand their conservatism is due in large part to the fact that they represent the gold standard of luxury watch making to the public at large (for better or worse). Any misstep carries the potential of ruining the brand (a la new coke), so deploying new ideas via the tudor route allows them to take risks, be bold, and test new ideas out without damaging the staid continuity of their established lines.

Just imagine if the pelagos was the updated submariner (minus the snowflake dial marker/hands)????

Tudor can do it precisely because Rolex can't
I get that Tudor allows Rolex more flexibility interms of marketing and reaching out to a lower price point. However, while people are currently pleased with the Pelagos, Tudor has had some designs in the past that were not so great and which didn't garner lots of positive comments.

The Pelagos is a good looking watch for Tudor. However, I don't wish that the Sub C was actually the Pelagos with a Rolex movement, Role dial, and mercedes hands. Overall, I think Rolex did a pretty good job modernizing the Sub with the Sub C. Is it perfect, no. Some people like it, others hate it...no watch can be everything to everyone, but if a large part of their target audience is happy and buying it, then the numbers speak for themselves.
 

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106
:spam:

A96EE324-D9B3-4717-9A08-082E2B99275A-2166-000001956F742BB3.jpg
 

Kai

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
3,137
Reaction score
806
Anyone here own (or handle) a Sea-Gull Tourbillon?

I'm thinking of getting a nice Chinese watch, and one of their tourbillons seems like a good candidate.
 

dddrees

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,323
Reaction score
1,605
I think having tudor allows rolex more flexibility in terms of marketing. As much as I complain that Rolex is lazy/boring, I also understand their conservatism is due in large part to the fact that they represent the gold standard of luxury watch making to the public at large (for better or worse). Any misstep carries the potential of ruining the brand (a la new coke), so deploying new ideas via the tudor route allows them to take risks, be bold, and test new ideas out without damaging the staid continuity of their established lines.

Just imagine if the pelagos was the updated submariner (minus the snowflake dial marker/hands)????

Tudor can do it precisely because Rolex can't
I actually like the fact that they rarely make changes. I think it just adds to it's ability to retain it's classic yet brand new look. The minor changes which they actually do make are topics of conversation amongst collectors, and I think it also helps it retain if not increase in value. If you bought one 30 years ago there isn't that many indicators that it isn't one which was bought yesterday unless you know what your looking for.
 

Benjamin Chee HH

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
503
Reaction score
323

Anyone here own (or handle) a Sea-Gull Tourbillon?
I'm thinking of getting a nice Chinese watch, and one of their tourbillons seems like a good candidate.


see -
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f72/personal-thoughts-owning-sea-gull-tourbillon-763917.html

another good alternative, combining vintage Chinese watch tradition from 1958 (plum blossom guilloche dial, red jewel seconds hand) with bespoke design and boutique production -

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f72/ge...esign-your-dream-chinese-watch-751238-11.html
 

Kaplan

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
5,259
Reaction score
4,584

just thought i would add a quick picture of my birth year vintage Sub and daily wearer... 1970 5513


That looks great!

A question to those of you with vintage Rolex sports watches: Can they still perform their intended role as a tool watch or do you have to baby it?

For instance, do you take it swimming?
 

dddrees

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,323
Reaction score
1,605
That looks great!
A question to those of you with vintage Rolex sports watches: Can they still perform their intended role as a tool watch or do you have to baby it?
For instance, do you take it swimming?
You can as long as it passes the pressure test. However I don't do this with any of my new watches so I see no reason to do it with my Red. Once the dial is ruined, there's no going back with a vintage watch especially when it's all original.
 
Last edited:

bings

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
259
Reaction score
50
new piece this week:

non-current model Rolex Sub, custom PVD coating and black diamond encrusted bezel. A stark departure from my typical tastes but it's actually more subtle than the description would suggest.

PVD%20Rolex%20(1).jpg


PVD%20Rolex%20(2).jpg


I have ordered an Everest Horology strap for it and have a red second hand lined up but i havent pulled the trigger on that yet.
 
Last edited:

Dino944

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
7,733
Reaction score
8,748
just thought i would add a quick picture of my birth year vintage Sub and daily wearer... 1970 5513




Beautiful! Thanks for sharing a photo of your birth year Sub.
A question to those of you with vintage Rolex sports watches: Can they still perform their intended role as a tool watch or do you have to baby it?
For instance, do you take it swimming?
I tend to baby my watches anyway. As DDD suggested, you can swim with it as long as you get it pressure tested. However, if you have something that is in great shape and appreciating in value why risk it.
new piece this week:
non-current model Rolex Sub, custom PVD coating and black diamond encrusted bezel. A stark departure from my typical tastes but it's actually more subtle than the description would suggest.

I have ordered an Everest Horology strap for it and have a red second hand lined up but i havent pulled the trigger on that yet.
Yikes!!! You paid for someone to spray paint your Sub and added bezel with polished coal! The PVD is ok, but the bezel is a real eye sore. Get a normal bezel for it and get rid of the wannabe pimp bezel.
 
Last edited:

Butler

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
855
Reaction score
2,154
just thought i would add a quick picture of my birth year vintage Sub and daily wearer... 1970 5513


That looks great!

A question to those of you with vintage Rolex sports watches: Can they still perform their intended role as a tool watch or do you have to baby it?

For instance, do you take it swimming?




Sure! (50 years old GMT Master) :bigstar:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
507,005
Messages
10,593,347
Members
224,350
Latest member
Rohitmentor
Top