- Joined
- Jun 1, 2011
- Messages
- 8,762
- Reaction score
- 5,597
Is royal Oxford considered something of a substitute for poplin?
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Is royal Oxford considered something of a substitute for poplin?
IThe only one I would question is the single cuff. I would question it on two grounds, first, that all your shirts would take links (bad idea) and second, that you'd want your link shirts to be single rather than double. Also, your objection to loose button cuffs is easily remedied in the bespoke process, I've gotten mine exactly the circumference that I like, trim without being loose or snug.
I think your choice of fabric also unecessarily excludes seasonality and I don't see what benefit you derive from that.
If I were design a minimalist shirt wardrobe, I would suggest one white FC shrit, one blue FC shirt (both broadcloth), a couple of white barrel cuff, then a dozen or so solid blue barell cuff, say six broadcloth, three linen-cotton, three chabray (or 4-4-4), or, if you have the cash, 5-5-5, which could get you through any given week's weather. Plus a few blue OCDBs.
Those above do tend to be the types I wear the most though I enjoy having some stripes, checks, and some other colors.
Personally, I don't like a gaping gauntlet. I think you can safely skip the guantlet button on BC but on FC (or LC). The buttons never catch (absurd) and I've never had one fall off.
Thinking back, in eight years now I can't recall a single instance of a button falling off a Geneva shirt. That's pretty good!