- Joined
- Jan 8, 2008
- Messages
- 10,132
- Reaction score
- 5,714
Thank you...
That's disingenuous chickenshit... and you know it. It's the the kind of pretense that makes these threads go sour.
Interest? What sudden interest. I gave my opinion, in response to a question, about Baker Belgian and Rendenbach. You took it from there.
What it was, was a non-shoemaker (you) criticizing the decision of a bona fide shoemaker--me. As Dutch said--it's the arrogance of ignorance.
You can't pretend that all that has been said is not related. The history is there...even if some wish it weren't. And just for the record, I think the only name calling I done with regard to you...or at least the most disparaging...is I called you a manager and a non-shoemaker.
As I mentioned, I don't criticize the decisions of other shoemakers. I don't think I even questioned your use of Rendenbach. And if Vass wants to use Rendenbach with the label, that's his prerogative. Doesn't mean a thing...good or bad...to me.
I said I didn't like it for my own work...and I explained why.
The decision is mine and mine alone and not open to criticism esp. not from people who have no possible way to understand or empathize.
The explanation was, despite opening myself to this kind of dig, free of charge--an insight into one, professional, shoemaker's point of view
No one...not Nick or anyone else...has any call, right or legitimacy to opine one way or the other. But that doesn't stop some people.
--
Nick - Others such as EG and Perry Ercolino also display the JR logo. Others such as Paolo Scarfora display his own huge logo on his. That's their preference and their prerogative. Yours too. DW doesn't want other logos on his products...that's his preference...and he explained why. There is no right or wrong. You are all free to do as you please. Consumers will either buy it or they won't. It's their choice too.
Thank you...
That's fair...just questioned his sudden interest....put it out there.
That's disingenuous chickenshit... and you know it. It's the the kind of pretense that makes these threads go sour.
Interest? What sudden interest. I gave my opinion, in response to a question, about Baker Belgian and Rendenbach. You took it from there.
What it was, was a non-shoemaker (you) criticizing the decision of a bona fide shoemaker--me. As Dutch said--it's the arrogance of ignorance.
You can't pretend that all that has been said is not related. The history is there...even if some wish it weren't. And just for the record, I think the only name calling I done with regard to you...or at least the most disparaging...is I called you a manager and a non-shoemaker.
As I mentioned, I don't criticize the decisions of other shoemakers. I don't think I even questioned your use of Rendenbach. And if Vass wants to use Rendenbach with the label, that's his prerogative. Doesn't mean a thing...good or bad...to me.
I said I didn't like it for my own work...and I explained why.
The decision is mine and mine alone and not open to criticism esp. not from people who have no possible way to understand or empathize.
The explanation was, despite opening myself to this kind of dig, free of charge--an insight into one, professional, shoemaker's point of view
No one...not Nick or anyone else...has any call, right or legitimacy to opine one way or the other. But that doesn't stop some people.
--
Last edited: