• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

milk: does a body terrible?

korce

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Messages
344
Reaction score
1
Agreed, but wouldn't you love to get your hands on some real natural butter, buttermilk, and unhomogenized whole milk? I don't care for the whole raw bit necessarily, but I had some excellent (whole, unhomogenized) milk from Dutchmen's Dairy while out in BC, and there is no turning back...
 

Beta

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by rjmaiorano
I guy I work with likes to tell me he doesn't drink milk because it thickens the skin... "how am I ever supposed to see my six-pack if I have thick skin?" Genius.

this is sort of true...but not the best description of what is happening.
if you are trying to get shredded, milk is out.

IMO, off season, milk and eggs have given me the best weight gains of my life.
During the summer, I don't drink it.
 

lance konami

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
17
Originally Posted by whacked
Right... you'll get the equivalent amount of calcium in a 8oz glass of milk from 1 pound of cooked broccoli, which by the way has over 200 calories.

"When it comes to building strong bones, broccoli's got it all for less. One cup of cooked broccoli contains 74 mg of calcium, plus 123 mg of vitamin C, which significantly improves calcium's absorption; all this for a total of only 44 calories. To put this in perspective, an orange contains no calcium, 69 mg of vitamin C, and 60-about 50% more-calories. Dairy products, long touted as the most reliable source of calcium, contain no vitamin C, but do contain saturated fat. A glass of 2% milk contains 121 calories, and 42 of those calories come from fat."

http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?t...odspice&dbid=9

I was just pointing out that there are vegetables out there that will supply you with plenty of calcium without all the fat and extra sugar AND you'll get more vitamin C which significantly improves calcium's absorption. Milk is obviously an excellent source of calcium, but when you factor in all the other benefits of looking for veggies to supply your calcium, I think they outweigh milk. Of course the dairy industry wants you to think otherwise.
 

javyn

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
25,520
Reaction score
14,826
We all get enough calcium already from veggies and dairy. Magnesium deficiency is the problem most have, not calcium.
 

globetrotter

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
20,341
Reaction score
423
Originally Posted by Gradstudent78
What single food are humans "suppose to eat"? We are omnivores and pretty much eat whatever we can eat. So people can drink milk, largely because whatever population their ancestors are from decided that they were "suppose to eat" milk.

there is a good argument that most of what we eat now was introduced to us after we completed 99.999 % of our evolutionary development. it is unclear how flexible our guts really are. the fact that our ansestors found that it was very econoimical to eat certain things doesn't mean that our bodies have adapted to them.
 

unjung

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
6,346
Reaction score
14
I think raw milk is interesting, but a lot of its advocates have the whole tinfoil hat thing going on.
tinfoil.gif


Originally Posted by globetrotter
there is a good argument that most of what we eat now was introduced to us after we completed 99.999 % of our evolutionary development. it is unclear how flexible our guts really are. the fact that our ansestors found that it was very econoimical to eat certain things doesn't mean that our bodies have adapted to them.

You mean our diet has changed within a very short evolutionary period? Agreed.
 

Gradstudent78

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
19
Originally Posted by unjung
I think raw milk is interesting, but a lot of its advocates have the whole tinfoil hat thing going on.
tinfoil.gif




You mean our diet has changed within a very short evolutionary period? Agreed.


That's true, but it applies to the majority of what we eat today, not just milk. The corn we eat today didn't exist (at least in a form most people would recognize) before agriculture in the Americas and the majority of the world hasn't been eating it very long.
 

Milhouse

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,917
Reaction score
1
There is a good reason to not drink milk. It doesn't taste good. Milk is better utilized for products that actually taste good, e.g. cheese, yogurt, ice cream, and for feeding baby veal cows. Mmm delicious.
 

js4design

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
799
Originally Posted by matadorpoeta
i started this same discussion about a month ago. when you started typing this one, mine should have popped up on your screen. it was called "milk".

i apologize. when i typed this title, nothing about milk popped up. next time i'll be more thorough.
 

Big Pun

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
6,055
Reaction score
896
I've hear that milk (and dairy in general) can worsen acne. Can someone shed some light on this ?
 

dibadiba

Affiliate Vendor
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
700
Reaction score
134
Originally Posted by Big Punisher
I've hear that milk (and dairy in general) can worsen acne. Can someone shed some light on this ?

most certainly makes it worse for me. i dont consume that much milk. maybe a large bowl of cereal and a glass a day. whenever i cut out milk for a few days, my skin completely clears up.
 

needler

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by Big Punisher
I've hear that milk (and dairy in general) can worsen acne. Can someone shed some light on this ?

People have blamed just about everything for acne at one time or another. There are some (sadly) amusing psychological studies out there that show just how terrible people are at distinguishing causation from correlation in their personal lives due to various biases. Believe "XXX worsens my acne" at your own peril.
 

tundrafour

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
397
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Milhouse
There is a good reason to not drink milk. It doesn't taste good. Milk is better utilized for products that actually taste good, e.g. cheese, yogurt, ice cream, and for feeding baby veal cows. Mmm delicious.

Agreed.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.6%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,961
Messages
10,593,126
Members
224,360
Latest member
WmynAnder
Top