• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • UNIFORM LA Japanese BDU Camo Cargo Pants Drop, going on right now.

    Uniform LA's Japanese BDU Camo Cargo Pants are now live. These cargos are based off vintage US Army BDU (Battle Dress Uniform) cargos. They're made of a premium 13.5-ounce Japanese twill that has been sulfur dyed for a vintage look. Every detail has been carried over from the inspiration and elevated. Available in two colorways, tundra and woodland. Please find them here

    Good luck!.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Pocket square / scarf / handkerchief in left sleeve?

Guy-Montag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Something I've seen worn with formal wear way back when (1700's-1800's?) was the pocket square / scarf / handkerchief tied to the left wrist / protruding from the left sleeve. You might see it with some of the styles of formal wear shown here - http://www.vam.ac.uk/collections/fas...ogy/index.html

My question is 'how retro is too retro?'. Could that look be pulled off in this day age?

Is it along the lines of 'for something that was in style in a given period, it looks out of place unless worn with dress clothes from that period?'
 

Cary Grant

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
9,657
Reaction score
430
That's very old world. Here's an example:

john-d-burgess_McSaughton_tartan.jpg


I can never recall seeing a man with a hany in the sleeve. I still see women do it, especially during weddings/funerals to have handy for the tears.
 

Threak

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
4
I don't think it was common because it was "in style."

Kleenex-Pocket-Pack-Large.jpg
 

ZON_JR

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
4
I think you might get away with it if you were John Gielgud, but you're obviously not so good luck with it.
 

NinthCircle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by Guy-Montag
Something I've seen worn with formal wear way back when (1700's-1800's?) was the pocket square / scarf / handkerchief tied to the left wrist / protruding from the left sleeve. '

I suspect this was 'in style' because men used snuff at the time and the hankie had to be ready for action at all times. Plus, you wouldn't want to stuff the nasty thing in your pocket...
 

Guy-Montag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by ZON_JR
I think you might get away with it if you were John Gielgud, but you're obviously not so good luck with it.

InsideGielgudCAM_468x456.jpg


If he could get away with wearing that, he could have gotten away with wearing anything.

Mildly eccentric, esoteric or retro is the target. Don't want to go beyond 'mild' though.
 

Guy-Montag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by teddieriley
^^that place looks scary.

Faux Greek columns with Roman-style lintels, French furniture, British railings with a Romanesque ceiling? Yeah, that place would scare me too!
 

luftvier

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
620
Originally Posted by NinthCircle
I suspect this was 'in style' because men used snuff at the time and the hankie had to be ready for action at all times. Plus, you wouldn't want to stuff the nasty thing in your pocket...

IIRC, snuff hankies were generally dark and patterned, so as to obscure the tobacco stains.
 

comrade

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 10, 2005
Messages
9,034
Reaction score
2,321
Originally Posted by Guy-Montag
Something I've seen worn with formal wear way back when (1700's-1800's?) was the pocket square / scarf / handkerchief tied to the left wrist / protruding from the left sleeve. You might see it with some of the styles of formal wear shown here - http://www.vam.ac.uk/collections/fas...ogy/index.html

My question is 'how retro is too retro?'. Could that look be pulled off in this day age?

Is it along the lines of 'for something that was in style in a given period, it looks out of place unless worn with dress clothes from that period?'


Not just in the 1700s-1800s. I had a professor of literature at Cornell who was
British with a very plummy accent and kept a white handkerchief in his sleeve.
It was the 1960s and his name was Eric Blackall:

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/11/18/ob...l?pagewanted=1
 

Featured Sponsor

Do You Have a Signature Fragrance?

  • Yes, I have a signature fragrance I wear every day

  • Yes, I have a signature fragrance but I don't wear it daily

  • No, I have several fragrances and rotate through them

  • I don't wear fragrance


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
508,634
Messages
10,603,735
Members
224,696
Latest member
JoshuClarke
Top