UnFacconable
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,458
- Reaction score
- 5,517
Er, are you sure they were mocking the app switcher, and not the idea of allowing multiple full apps to run simultaneously? I'm not sure why they would slag on an interface for switching apps... I mean, how else would you switch apps??
This is a given. My point was that they're not just allowing every app to run all the time... it's a very controlled implementation of "multitasking." (Perhaps "background processes" would be a more accurate term.)
I'm waiting for aqhong and others who were defending Apple's previous choice not to implement multi-tasking for a variety of reasons to now turn the corner and explain why this version is the best thing since sliced bread. The reality is that the failure to implement it previously was a flaw. Even now, it's only implementable on the newest iphone due to a lack of sufficient memory on previous ones. I stand by my earlier assertion that the hardware wasn't sufficient to "flip a switch" and enable multi-tasking which is why we have the limited version that has been released.
I get that "you people" to borrow a term from earlier in the thread, think that Apple is incapable of wrong, but let's try to remove the 1984 element of fanboyism ("we are friends with eurasia, we have always been friends with eurasia") to creep into the discussion when Apple finally does go back and correct things that were obvious flaws before. All of the theoretical arguments made previously in support of Apple's decision have now been disproved. This wasn't the result of some stroke of genius not made possible until last week, this was something that could have been done earlier but for Apple's (i) inability to executed it on the hardware, or (ii) inability to realize it was a useful feature. It wasn't to protect the users from themselves.
Also, for what it's worth, my brother is convinced that the real reason Apple won't support flash is because they don't want anyone to have the ability to release apps that aren't through Apple's store, so any type of environment (aka java, flash) where you have broad enough programming capability to run an app remotely, will not be supported by Apple. This makes a lot more sense to me than Apple fighting the flash monopoly. Think about it, you submit an app to Apple, it gets denied so you reimplement it as a flash or java website.