- Joined
- Oct 10, 2010
- Messages
- 66,397
- Reaction score
- 33,106
Yes and no. Clearly, clothing is a uiversal human need, and better clothing can satisfy other wants (e.g. aesthetic, emotional, social) in addition to its immediate practical purpose. All of this is irrational, but is probably relatively harmless if kept within reason (e.g. does not consume material resources and time better spent on other activities/causes).
While some lip service to frugality is occasionally paid on SF, I am personally growing increasingly jaded. Our society and the world is so riddled with problems, that the extent of time and money wasted on clothing automatically makes most SF-ers (myself included) turbo-douches. I.e. it is not a matter of whether you can "afford it" at all, but a matter of how could you possibly justify that against the backdrop of over-abundant ills. Grownass men should be devoting their energies and talents to something better than prancing around in overpriced stuff.
Thus, in some sense, the absolute amount of clothing expenditures does also become a measure of douchbagery. If so, Vox is the ultimate douchebag, and you all should be ashamed for sheepishly bowing to this cocksucking poster child of the oligarchy.