HgaleK
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 4,337
- Reaction score
- 87
That's because Drakkar is old-school, hollister is new and their target market has been conditioned to believe that it's good. Actually - not so much 'good' as 'familiar' and 'cool' and 'hip'. They smell your Drakkar, but it's not a popular scent, therefore, no comment.
Welcome to herd mentality 101. Also, welcome to the choice between having your own taste (better or worse) and doing your own thing vs. taking the popular route.
You know, I wonder just how far conditioning can move a product's perception. Let's say that some prankster changes the stock A&F room cologne with bottles (marked A&F) of 'kitty-bum'. For discussion purposes let's say it's not too bad, maybe it's got some orange in there, to make it seem deliberate, but it's not pleasant. After a few months, will everyone seek out the 'kitty-bum' smell? Because that's what they got used to in A&F? Food for thought.
BTW: - OP - You will probably get laid more if you go with the hollister.
Are you sure that it's herd mentality and not simply a group of fragrances or scent families that kids dig? The ones I listed are popular, but not nearly as ubiquitous in high school or college as Abercrombie Fierce, etc. They're simply a little sweet and a little citrusy. There's also Creed GIT, which is fairly unique in any younger demographic (most people my age and younger have never heard of it or Cool Water), but still very popular with the people that I'm around.
Is it that much different from kids drinking punch/wine coolers/light beer and hating scotch, brandy, etc*? Certain flavors are easier on the senses and don't take time to acquire a taste for.
*I would never compare DN to a good scotch or brandy- it's still gross.