UNIFORM LA CHILLICOTHE WORK JACKET Drop, going on right now.
Uniform LA's Chillicothe Work Jacket is an elevated take on the classic Detroit Work Jacket. Made of ultra-premium 14-ounce Japanese canvas, it has been meticulously washed and hand distressed to replicate vintage workwear that’s been worn for years, and available in three colors.
This just dropped today. If you missed out on the preorder, there are some sizes left, but they won't be around for long. Check out the remaining stock here
Good luck!.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
There was a brilliant article in Modculture some time ago...'London boys' Gavin Henderson,the best thing that i have read about the late 70s and 80s from one lads viewpoint.There was a brief thing for the casuals* round here to wear Belstaff smocks. Perhaps it was the one-upmanship"" of the trend, similar in shape to cagoules but more expensive and harder to get. One of my friends badgered his parents to get one from him, but he was short for his age and it had an elasticated hood. He never wore it.
A short while later, we went on an outdoor adventure course, and the centre outfitted us all in the same Belstaff smocks.
I didn't ever buy my own, but I think I liked it enough to get a 60s cadet smock which was more of a student shabby equivalent.
*Football trendies seemed to be the local term.
**As an outsider, it seemed to be a trend driven by rarity and expense. I suppose lots of other trends are the same, but this was the one I was most aware of. I certainly couldn't understand the middle-aged golfer vibe.
Shop around...they are always on offer somewhere.Very tempting.
I've just given it a read. Interesting stuff. The effect of inter-factional violence clearly had an impact.There was a brilliant article in Modculture some time ago...'London boys' Gavin Henderson,the best thing that i have read about the late 70s and 80s from one lads viewpoint.
I suppose all fashions have their point where being unique becomes the aim, either through rarity or novelty, rather than because the look is something you actually like. Or even if you do like it, it isn't something you want to wear more than a couple of times. There was a brief thing for leg-warmers which I think was a Manchester thing which had filtered down to us. Once it ceased being a novelty, it soon disappeared. The whole thing of mocking someone for wearing something which you had yourself worn a couple of months earlier is something I wouldn't really have got my head around.I can see some parallels to original Mods in the one upmanship and pursuit of exclusive almost unobtainable gear but the end result doesn’t really compare for me.
I found these copies on Ebay for £70....the originals go for a lot more...There was a brief thing for the casuals* round here to wear Belstaff smocks. Perhaps it was the one-upmanship"" of the trend, similar in shape to cagoules but more expensive and harder to get. One of my friends badgered his parents to get one from him, but he was short for his age and it had an elasticated hood. He never wore it.
A short while later, we went on an outdoor adventure course, and the centre outfitted us all in the same Belstaff smocks.
I didn't ever buy my own, but I think I liked it enough to get a 60s cadet smock which was more of a student shabby equivalent.
*Football trendies seemed to be the local term.
**As an outsider, it seemed to be a trend driven by rarity and expense. I suppose lots of other trends are the same, but this was the one I was most aware of. I certainly couldn't understand the middle-aged golfer vibe.
The bloke in the Modculture article says the same about the revival 'mod' scene in London and later about the Casual scene...more fun before the media and the masses found out about it.I think he is a classic of wanting the novelty but wanting to move on when a style was no longer novel and/or has become mainstream.
"There was a certain pleasure in witnessing people leap from tight snow-washed denim jeans to flowing robes, but not enough to compensate for the fact that your scene is being sold wholesale."
His description of his New Romantic days appears on the surface to satisfy that urge for constant novelty, but there is perhaps a sterility in that chaos just as much as following hidebound rules (I seem to be paraphrasing Michael Moorcock). There is a big difference between "I want to wear this because it is new and I like it" and "I can't wear this because it is old even though I like it".
Once NR became mainstream, Elms says that he reacted by wearing lots of suits, though with something of a 40s vibe.
To be fair to him, he does acknowledge that he was prone to flitting from style to style.
Mine was from an Army and Navy in 1984. I suppose they;d have been pretty common then. I mostly bought it when I found out how much it rained in Plymouth.I found these copies on Ebay for £70....the originals go for a lot more...
I never had one,they are cotton were they very rainproof ?Mine was from an Army and Navy in 1984. I suppose they;d have been pretty common then. I mostly bought it when I found out how much it rained in Plymouth.