evangel21
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2017
- Messages
- 290
- Reaction score
- 585
Mine looks pretty neat to me.
I agree that the stitching of that pair could have been better. Whether that is unacceptable enough to ask for refund is for the OP to decide.
It is fair that we'd expect a certain QC based on the price we pay regardless the amount. From the maker's point, perhaps the pair passes their QC given that the untidy stitching doesn't compromise the structural integrity of the shoe.
I've had HW pairs that were lasted poorly but passed the maker AND retailer QC. Finally settled the issue with slight discounts.
To diss the maker based on one pair when there are many well made ones by said maker may be a bit overreacting. But that's my humble insignificant opinion.
Oct Tenth still makes great shoes at that price point. But YMMV.
Disclaimer: I'm in no way associated with OT. Just someone who has a few pairs from different makers. What do I know anyway.
I agree that the stitching of that pair could have been better. Whether that is unacceptable enough to ask for refund is for the OP to decide.
It is fair that we'd expect a certain QC based on the price we pay regardless the amount. From the maker's point, perhaps the pair passes their QC given that the untidy stitching doesn't compromise the structural integrity of the shoe.
I've had HW pairs that were lasted poorly but passed the maker AND retailer QC. Finally settled the issue with slight discounts.
To diss the maker based on one pair when there are many well made ones by said maker may be a bit overreacting. But that's my humble insignificant opinion.
Oct Tenth still makes great shoes at that price point. But YMMV.
Disclaimer: I'm in no way associated with OT. Just someone who has a few pairs from different makers. What do I know anyway.
Last edited: