ymc226
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 45
- Reaction score
- 221
I want to get a pair of very high quality dark indego raw denim in the 14+oz category, either Sanforized or non-Sanforized in a slim/tapered style. I've read the forum here for the last 3 days going through many of the threads on the individual makers: Roy, IH, etc. Either they go on to become "blogs" to advertise the latest additions in the store or are not that helpful at all.
I've also gone back and read about 80 pages of the Gustin thread. Posters write about quality in a number of posts but not many specifics are brought up. More often than not, praise is given to the quality of said maker. What specific traits are important and distinguishing. Is there an easy way to tell the quality of the build. It seems all hems are chain stitched. All of the quality makers use either Cone (American) or various Japanese fabrics. They all have personalized hardware. Rivets can be hidden; is this a good thing?
I am just getting into jeans, have about 4 pairs Gustins which coming from Levis growing up, is better. However, I'm looking for a step up in quality and workmanship. Looking a Roy's, his detail just from the pictures of the inside is amazing but he doesn't have a slim tapered model presently. Did he ever? Are there other marks I should consider? My preferences would be American made either American or Japanese fabric. Some websites have distressed models as well but I'd like to avoid those.
Given the price of IH and other Japanese makers, what makes them "better" in terms of construction/fit/fabric? I tend to be Japan centric at times and would like to get a pair of Japanese jeans as well but what are the distinguishing differences among the brands.
I know as one goes up the scale of anything, the perceived return quickly shrinks. I shoot with digital Leicas which are not better than SLRs from Canikon. Also have a GT3 which is not faster than any other sports car driven properly but I appreciate the timeless quality of design.
I've also gone back and read about 80 pages of the Gustin thread. Posters write about quality in a number of posts but not many specifics are brought up. More often than not, praise is given to the quality of said maker. What specific traits are important and distinguishing. Is there an easy way to tell the quality of the build. It seems all hems are chain stitched. All of the quality makers use either Cone (American) or various Japanese fabrics. They all have personalized hardware. Rivets can be hidden; is this a good thing?
I am just getting into jeans, have about 4 pairs Gustins which coming from Levis growing up, is better. However, I'm looking for a step up in quality and workmanship. Looking a Roy's, his detail just from the pictures of the inside is amazing but he doesn't have a slim tapered model presently. Did he ever? Are there other marks I should consider? My preferences would be American made either American or Japanese fabric. Some websites have distressed models as well but I'd like to avoid those.
Given the price of IH and other Japanese makers, what makes them "better" in terms of construction/fit/fabric? I tend to be Japan centric at times and would like to get a pair of Japanese jeans as well but what are the distinguishing differences among the brands.
I know as one goes up the scale of anything, the perceived return quickly shrinks. I shoot with digital Leicas which are not better than SLRs from Canikon. Also have a GT3 which is not faster than any other sports car driven properly but I appreciate the timeless quality of design.