- Joined
- Oct 6, 2023
- Messages
- 993
- Reaction score
- 1,980
I love the Husbands Paris' style.Another one for the balmacaan fraction.
View attachment 2114113
From Husbands Paris in a classic herringbone donegal tweed.
LuxeSwap Auctions will be ending soon!
LuxeSwap is the original consignor for Styleforum, and has weekly auctions that show the diversity of our community, with hundreds lof starting at $0.99 every week, ending starting at 5:30 Eastern Time. Please take the time to check them out here. You may find something that fits your wardrobe exactly, maybe even these Trickers boot
Good luck!
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I love the Husbands Paris' style.Another one for the balmacaan fraction.
View attachment 2114113
From Husbands Paris in a classic herringbone donegal tweed.
Looks like what we wore in Chicago as kids.Picked up a new to me vintage skye tweed coat. It is not very fitted so not sure if it is just the style coat or could it be taken in 1-2 inches?
I’m not even sure I know what style it is because it looks like a balmacaan but the shoulders are not raglan style. The third pics shows with a sport coat under and the fourth without. View attachment 2116495 View attachment 2116497 View attachment 2116499 View attachment 2116501 View attachment 2116503 View attachment 2116505
You have the makings of a very fine coat. Great vintage cloth.Picked up a new to me vintage skye tweed coat. It is not very fitted so not sure if it is just the style coat or could it be taken in 1-2 inches?
I’m not even sure I know what style it is because it looks like a balmacaan but the shoulders are not raglan style. The third pics shows with a sport coat under and the fourth without. View attachment 2116495 View attachment 2116497 View attachment 2116499 View attachment 2116501 View attachment 2116503 View attachment 2116505
Wow i had no idea. Ill look into that.You have the makings of a very fine coat. Great vintage cloth.
What Kazak, above, says about his youth, that must have been a Midwestern thing. We New England kids, and I am older than Kazak, did not wear coats like that.
Yes, you would benefit from a nip or two at the waist. The previous owner has attempted this by moving the buttons. Which is cheating. Look at the front of the coat, see how the buttons are much further inward than their corresponding holes? Buttons and holes should be equal distance from the edge. This discrepancy is further highlighted when you look at the pocket flaps. They too should be equal distance apart when coat is buttoned. And they're not by a long shot. Again, this is because the buttons have been moved. Put them back, and have the sides tailored in properly.
Picked up a new to me vintage skye tweed coat. It is not very fitted so not sure if it is just the style coat or could it be taken in 1-2 inches?
I’m not even sure I know what style it is because it looks like a balmacaan but the shoulders are not raglan style. The third pics shows with a sport coat under and the fourth without. View attachment 2116495 View attachment 2116497 View attachment 2116499 View attachment 2116501 View attachment 2116503 View attachment 2116505
You have the makings of a very fine coat. Great vintage cloth.
What Kazak, above, says about his youth, that must have been a Midwestern thing. We New England kids, and I am older than Kazak, did not wear coats like that.
Yes, you would benefit from a nip or two at the waist. The previous owner has attempted this by moving the buttons. Which is cheating. Look at the front of the coat, see how the buttons are much further inward than their corresponding holes? Buttons and holes should be equal distance from the edge. This discrepancy is further highlighted when you look at the pocket flaps. They too should be equal distance apart when coat is buttoned. And they're not by a long shot. Again, this is because the buttons have been moved. Put them back, and have the sides tailored in properly.
^
Jackets, as they come from the manufacturer, do not usually have the buttons sewn clear through to the inside. But when they are tinkered with, either at home or by another tailor, they often do get sewn straight through the cloth, knotting on the inside. Check your coat to see if the button thread does this, further corroboration they've been fiddled with.
Again, swell coat. Your pics, at least on this cell phone, do not show full length. If you can spare a couple of inches at the bottom, you might consider cropping that off and use the cuttings to craft an adjustable belt for the rear. Not that you'll necessarily need it, but it drops the style temperature, it becomes cooler.
May seem bold because its something you haven't worn before but it is a classic design and well proportioned. You want the skirt to be full enough to walk and move in. If the room isn't there you will be fighting the coat when you walk or sit. This looks perfect.I posted this on another thread but this is probably the better place. RTW Ulster - 800g wool fabric. Debating whether to keep or not. It feels a little too big on the skirt and too tight in the waist/hip.
Looking for feedback here if the jacket is worth keeping and tailoring, and if so, what to tailor.
I’m not used to this style and it’s a bit bold so if I keep I want to be confident in the choice.
View attachment 2117019
Not necessarily true about the button placement on a topcoat. We always place the buttons further from the edge on SB topcoats. This looks about right. If you look at the vertical line of the front edge it is just right and aligns with the spacing between the points of the collar. The slight increase on the overlap keeps the wind from passing thru.You have the makings of a very fine coat. Great vintage cloth.
What Kazak, above, says about his youth, that must have been a Midwestern thing. We New England kids, and I am older than Kazak, did not wear coats like that.
Yes, you would benefit from a nip or two at the waist. The previous owner has attempted this by moving the buttons. Which is cheating. Look at the front of the coat, see how the buttons are much further inward than their corresponding holes? Buttons and holes should be equal distance from the edge. This discrepancy is further highlighted when you look at the pocket flaps. They too should be equal distance apart when coat is buttoned. And they're not by a long shot. Again, this is because the buttons have been moved. Put them back, and have the sides tailored in properly.
Thanks Despos for your perspective and knowledge. I will need to get the ruler out and see what the case is. I know it “looks” untouched and it had tags in the pocket plus no lint or anything in the pockets.Not necessarily true about the button placement on a topcoat. We always place the buttons further from the edge on SB topcoats. This looks about right. If you look at the vertical line of the front edge it is just right and aligns with the spacing between the points of the collar. The slight increase on the overlap keeps the wind from passing thru.
The front edge is cut to taper closed from just above the chest to the neck. You can see how the vertical line of the edge is cutting off vertical line of pattern in the cloth. Designers choice. Some choose this way and some like to cut the front edge straight to preserve the line of the cloth pattern.
The pockets are the same distance from the front edge. You only see the edge on the left front with the buttonholes. The overlap of the fronts reduces the distance to the pocket on the right side. If the pockets were equal distance from the edge when buttoned, they would be place at a different distance from the front edge that would be visible when unbuttoned.
You're very kind, Thank you!I'm just glad @Despos is posting and I'm all here for it