Dino944
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2011
- Messages
- 7,732
- Reaction score
- 8,747
And that tank looks like a mess. Cartier has made tanks for around 95 years. How is it possible that they have forgot how to make them? I can deal with date at six and sweep seconds on the dial, a la the tank solo, as it really does not destroy the integrity of the dial (although I would prefer just hours and minutes). I can also deal with automatic rather than manual, though that is close to a deal breaker. At least on the solo the case back is solid. But on a new, in house watch, why would you screw with every element that made the watch great. The curvature of the case makes it look more like a gp 1945, the circular automatic movement looks silly, the watch is much thicker and much larger, the dial is a cluttered mess.
The date window alone would not have been a plus for me, but the date window and sub dial create too much clutter on this dial. Its as though they moved away from what made the Tank famous. Its simplicity and not having lots of extraneous other functions is what makes their classic Tanks so attractive, at least to me.
As for the curved case, its actually a very Cartier look. It's something that Cartier has done for many years with their Tank Cintree and Tank Americaine.
This is Cartier trying to use the movement from the Calibre in all of their watches. They need another in house movement for their reasonably priced watches, that doesn't have the bizarre giant subdial, and either has no seconds hand or has one centrally mounted. Also, if you are sticking a round movement in a rectangular watch, just give it a solid back (like PP and VC do). This watch is an example of why I don't care for round movements in rectangular or square watches.