Relative Slimness in Denim

[whodini]

Originally Posted by onion

I say 1 should be the Nudie Super Slim Kim. Not much is going to be tighter that those.

A 10 could be maybe Kicking Mule 1972 or something....

Ever try on a pair of Aprils?

 

[onion]

Originally Posted by whodini

Ever try on a pair of Aprils?

Can't say that I have. They really make jeans tighter than the SSK?

Craziness.....

 

[sho'nuff]

Originally Posted by onion

Well if this is going to be a serious thread we need to figure out what the 1 and 10 are going to be. I mean APC Rescues aren't particularly slim, but compared to Jnco's they are tight as hell.

I say 1 should be the Nudie Super Slim Kim. Not much is going to be tighter that those.

A 10 could be maybe Kicking Mule 1972 or something....

im not sure if slim kim would be a 1 as i heard they are still not that skinny or considered skinny at the knee down.

i have seen some jeans on some 'skaters' and guys around here that are like Literally skin tight from their pelvis down to their ankle. pretty sick but i am sure those jeans would be considered 1 !

 

[Studio27]

Originally Posted by onion

Can't say that I have. They really make jeans tighter than the SSK?

Craziness.....

April 77 Joey

 

[onion]

 

[sho'nuff]

yeah. that would be considered 1.

(that of course if he is wearing his recommended size in those)

 

[Studio27]

I googled aprill 77 super slim kim and the first thread I found had that picture.

 

[breakz]

Jesus Christ, he looks like a ballerina. I nominate April 77s for 1.

 

[sho'nuff]

i'd like to see someone's photo of what number 10 would be.

 

[Studio27]

the one suggested was kmw 1972. It's not *really* all that baggy, but I can see it approaching the SF limit if that makes sense. I'd be curious how they relate to the baggy bjorns for example. KMW 1972 in Rinsed (China Made)

 

[onion]

Originally Posted by Studio27

the one suggested was kmw 1972. It's not *really* all that baggy, but I can see it approaching the SF limit if that makes sense. I'd be curious how they relate to the baggy bjorns for example.
Yeah that's true. I know there are plenty of more baggy raw denim brands like LRG or WESC, but since not many people here on SF wear them (or similar cuts) I spit out the 1972. If people are wearing baggier cuts, by all means list them. (On an aside, the 1972 are discontinued, which sort of makes them useless to list, as not many people will be purchasing them.)

 

[morse9443]

Originally Posted by shoe

i'd like to see someone's photo of what number 10 would be.
That might be a 10 on the homeboy on the left. Those are just.....the WORST. And April 77's are like a negative 3, guy is definitely sterile. I hate them both a lot.

 

[modagg]

Originally Posted by blackplatano

Not black or angry. Please try again.

black, hispanic; same difference

 

[breakz]

Originally Posted by modagg

black, hispanic; same difference

 

[sho'nuff]

Originally Posted by morse9443

That might be a 10 on the homeboy on the left. Those are just.....the WORST. And April 77's are like a negative 3, guy is definitely sterile. I hate them both a lot.



are those diesel on the left?