STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
the difference is that steven alan is garbage and the shirts fit like a tent. i could fit 2 of me in a steven alan xs. the fabrics are inferior and they are not tailored at all. huge difference.
the difference is that steven alan is garbage and the shirts fit like a tent. i could fit 2 of me in a steven alan xs. the fabrics are inferior and they are not tailored at all. huge difference.
Fit is subjective. I respectfully disagree about the quality and I believe that we may have different definitions of the word "huge."
The problem with this is you can't be sure of the fit of the clothes / quality of the construction. Also, I may be wrong but I imagine it would be very difficult to return any ill-fitting / ****** clothes.. Plus BoO has some brand cache, even though many of you pretend this doesn't matter, I'm sure it impacts your decison making at least a little bit.
Just go to a store and try them on? I guess if you're blind ordering online that's true, but I think if you know your chest the rest is pretty much set.
^^ but a lot of guys just like being able to buy a shirt that already exists, appeals to him, and he knows it will fit
Exactly.
kunk- Speaking of filippak, have you seen any stores with their button ups for cheap? I want that light blue one gilt was selling (not in my size of course) and i know you're into filippak. Filippak retail prices are pretty high as well and their button ups are definitely not as nice material and fit wise. I still like the filippak shirt that i have right now, but then again, i got it for $50 used.
kunk some of us are content to buy clothes that fit, not jam ourselves in to raf simons