• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

2017 MLB Season Thread

zalb916

Distinguished Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
1,593

Doug Fister 3.45 10-10 137Ks 1.19 .249
Madison Bumgarner 3.37 16-11 191Ks 1.11 .234
Only the ERAs and BAAs are close.


This is just a lazy comparison.

First, W-L record has been proven to be a pretty poor measure of a pitcher's performance.

Second, Bumgarner has more Ks, but he also pitched significantly more innings (47 to be exact). A better indicator is SOs/9, which shows Bumgarner with a slight lead: 8.3 to 7.6.

Third, BAA is probably not as good of an indicator as WHIP. Bumgarner's WHIP was 1.11. Fister's was 1.19. That's a difference of 0.08. Small difference that can probably be attributed to Fister facing a DH, and Bumgarner pitching in a pitcher's park.

Finally, Fister's 3.45 ERA is in the AL with a poor defensive team, while Bumgarner's 3.37 ERA is in the NL with a solid defense and a great pitcher's park. You need to look at ERA+. Fister had a 122, while Bumgarner had a 103. Frankly, ERA+ is probably the best indicator of quality of pitching, and Fister is substantially better. Moreover, the average ERA in the AL is about 0.25 higher, so Fister's ERA is even considerably more impressive than Bumgarner's, if you account for that too.

Look, I've got no dog in this fight. I could care less about either team. Fister and Bumgarner are both solid pitchers, and both bring a lot to the table. I appreciate the love for your team, but at least be honest about them.
 
Last edited:

NorCal

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
9,992
Reaction score
4,704

This is just a lazy comparison.
First, W-L record has been proven to be a pretty poor measure of a pitcher's performance.
Second, Bumgarner has more Ks, but he also pitched significantly more innings (47 to be exact). A better indicator is SOs/9, which shows Bumgarner with a slight lead: 8.3 to 7.6.
Third, BAA is probably not as good of an indicator as WHIP. Bumgarner's WHIP was 1.11. Fister's was 1.19. That's a difference of 0.08. Small difference that can probably be attributed to Fister facing a DH, and Bumgarner pitching in a pitcher's park.
Finally, Fister's 3.45 ERA is in the AL with a poor defensive team, while Bumgarner's 3.37 ERA is in the NL with a solid defense and a great pitcher's park. You need to look at ERA+. Fister had a 122, while Bumgarner had a 103. Frankly, ERA+ is probably the best indicator of quality of pitching, and Fister is substantially better. Moreover, the average ERA in the AL is about 0.25 higher, so Fister's ERA is even considerably more impressive than Bumgarner's, if you account for that too.
Look, I've got no dog in this fight. I could care less about either team. Fister and Bumgarner are both solid pitchers, and both bring a lot to the table. I appreciate the love for your team, but at least be honest about them.


I despise Sabermetrics and all their ilk.

It all boils down to W-L in the end.
 

zalb916

Distinguished Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
1,593

I despise Sabermetrics and all their ilk.
It all boils down to W-L in the end.


You can despise it all you want, but it doesn't make it not true. Actions beyond the control of a pitcher's performance have a significant impact on whether they win or lose. It's just not a good measure of how well they pitch.
 
Last edited:

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106

You can despise it all you want, but it doesn't make it not true. Actions beyond the control of a pitcher's performance have a significant impact on whether they win or lose. It's just not a good measure of how well they pitch.


+1
 

clarinetplayer

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
7,677
Berry will lead off in the 9th. I hope it is still only 1-0. The tension is killing me.
 
Last edited:

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106
fack! so much for my 3 to 1, tigers, call. :fu:
 

clarinetplayer

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
7,677
All this tension, and all we will get, for sure, are "Tacos for America".
 
Last edited:

clarinetplayer

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
7,677
Our only hope is to win all three games in the "D". The weather for these games will be dry, but extremely cold for fall.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.2%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 10.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 42 17.0%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
507,006
Messages
10,593,438
Members
224,355
Latest member
ESF
Top