• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Slewfoot

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
4,520
Reaction score
615

a couple of members asked me how the peter compares to the new peter, here it goes. The peter last (grain shoe) and the new peter last (suede shoe) look very similar to me


Great shot! Seems like the Peter is a touch more bulbous around the toe - which I'm fine with and like. How is the fit on the two? One looser or tighter than the other?
 

Concordia

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
7,730
Reaction score
1,679
Peter is smaller than P2. I can actually get into the latter, although the shoes that I persuaded myself to buy turned out to be too long and were still pretty narrow about the instep.

I think of the Peter as a very narrow 3636. Which could easily be wrong, as I couldn't even begin to get into it at the store. Someone who fits both might have a different verdict. But I can wear one if not the other, even though they look strikingly similar.
 
Last edited:

rikod

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
1,365
Reaction score
567
Yes the peter is a bit smaller, feel more snug and look a little bit flatter around the toe. less curved and more symmetric.I could be wrong too, they are very similar but fit a little different. I only tried them at home, they are new and didn't wear them yet for the first time.
 

Michael Ay329

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
54
Joonian...I do NOT see it as the U last.. maybe F or the New Peter last as it appears more rounded to me

I would pay less than $450 for them
 
Last edited:

thecentennial

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
508
Reaction score
11
New peter?

And I have to agree with the poster above, considering you can buy a new pair straight from Vass for not much more.
 
Last edited:

Slewfoot

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
4,520
Reaction score
615
Those are F last and $450 is a great deal for them if they fit.
 

joonian

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
431
Reaction score
4
BTW, not sure if people already do this, but here's an easy way to search through Vass's maze-like website for styles and colours with Google Images. This search for example shows images labeled Cognac.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 104 36.7%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 103 36.4%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 36 12.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 46 16.3%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 41 14.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
508,230
Messages
10,600,424
Members
224,564
Latest member
SpeedingLawyer
Top