- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 28,525
- Reaction score
- 30,351
...
Last edited:
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I dont get the Starbucks joke
But yea within a first month of me having my bike someone knocked it over
Within a year meter maids towed it
Only way to have a nice bike there is to garage it and trailer it to Monticello
I am in NC now
Brooklyn to NC? Kind of an extreme change
Here's the analogy I typically use: some people were taught to swim by simply throwing them in the pool and letting them work things out. There's a difference, though, between learning to swim and figuring out how not to drown, and there's a difference between figuring out how to get down the road without killing yourself and learning to ride properly. The biggest downside to starting on a sportbike is that most of the riders that survive become pretty much uneducatable - they "know what they're doing" and don't want to be bothered about poor technique or bad habits. They write off best practices as a difference of opinion.
Tons of crappy drivers make it from point A to point B without dying and figure they're good enough. Sure, they have a lot of close calls while they're texting or on the phone, but if it were really dangerous wouldn't they be dead by now? The same thing happens with motorcycles, but because of the greater mystique of danger, everyone that doesn't kill themselves figures "it worked out great." And worse, they tell their friends that.
The real issue, imo, is Americans want to do things, but they don't care if they do them well or responsibly. They want a bunch of guns, but why insist they learn how to shoot properly or store them safely? They want to drive, but why should they be expected to take care of their car or insure it - that only matters if they crash and they aren't going to, right? And sure, almost every other industrialized nation sees fit to require multiple testing and years of experience before unleashing someone on the roads on a liter bike, but those guys are all sissies - gimme!
I don't doubt you and others that started like that can ride a motorcycle. I sincerely doubt you're the best rider you could be, and I hate that so many people are content to muddle through in this and so many other areas of life.
I think you mean uneducable or ineducable. Just because someone buys a bike other than a 750 doesn't mean that they automatically don't know anything about riding, don't want to learn anything about riding, etc. While there are many riders like this I don't believe it's the majority. Also, one can buy a fittingly sized bike and handle it / learn how to handle it quite well.
I think the advice from the blog in Trini's post is really good. In fact, I may need to spend some more time practicing with the front brake in a parking lot.
My front break is so crappy that I could never possibly have that problem (I've tried).
I think the advice from the blog in Trini's post is really good. In fact, I may need to spend some more time practicing with the front brake in a parking lot.
Is it worth it to upgrade my chain on the kz400?
Its a standard chain and its got a little bit of rust on some of the outside plates, but otherwise seems to be in good condition. Don't think it is too stretched or anything...it can't be the original chain that came with the bike (34 years and 28k miles wouldn't leave it looking like that).
The guy who mounted my tires suggested putting on an o-ring chain, but I can't really see why other than increased longevity and decreased maintenance. Replacing a still-good part for better longevity doesn't make sense (since it hasn't worn out yet). Since the bike sometimes gets rained on and sits outside, I probably want to keep it freshly lubed anyways because the outside will start to rust up even if the o-rings are keeping the insides nice and lubed.
Just not sure if there is any good reason to spend a hundred bucks on something that is working fine now.
When I was 14 or 15, I envisioned myself racing and winning the Tour de France and so I set up a rigid training schedule. I lived in Eastern Queens back then and I would ride out to the velodrome in Kissena Park (this is back in the 80s) in Flushing and ride laps. I had read (and experienced) that the front brake performed 85-95% of the braking duties. I had a track bike ("fixie" for the hipsters or a "constant" for any West Indians) for back then with only a front brake so front brake use only (as well as modulation to avoid lock ups) was second nature. One of the first things I noticed when I started riding motorcycles was that most new riders would only use their rear brakes and were frightened to touch the front for fear of flipping over. I have never had that issue thanks to my childhood obsession.