STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
So I know this is the gitman thread but...
Tossing up between two white oxfords:
NWT Gitman Vintage white oxford size L for $85; or
NWOT Gant Rugger white oxford size M for $70.
I believe the sizing on the L Gitman/M Gant Rugger to be fairly equivalent
I have plenty of BB ESF subpima white oxfords for work wear, so this is purely for casual wear - potentially wearing untucked. I'm 6 foot, broad neck and shoulders, 33 waist hence have trouble finding shirts that fit nicely up top without being terribly billowy down the bottom (have to get all my BB shirts darted).
Leaning towards the Gitman, especially because I hate the visible stamp they put on all the Gant Rugger shirts.
Can anyone who owns both Gant Rugger/Gitman shirts comment on the quality?
Does anyone have any comparison images between Small and Extra Small?
Looking to pick up a few more shirts and want to see if I should size up.
But I mean they are sticking out and stuff. Some of them I pulled off successfully while some seem to be actual stitching.