TRINI
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 9,006
- Reaction score
- 658
With that sort of (machine) padding, I wouldn't.
Then you're completely unrealistic.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
With that sort of (machine) padding, I wouldn't.
With that sort of (machine) padding, I wouldn't.
CaymanS, a little knowledge is dangerous. Take a step back from the keyboard.
I have no idea what you mean.
probably the (machine) padding comment.
Yes.
The break ruins the appearance of the trousers. A different cut where the cloth flows out over the shoe would look much nicer. Even less baggy legs and it can be done. For how baggy the legs are the bottoms should be out over the front of the shoes more.
Belly and the next button up would forgive a lot.
Barbera does a good example of showing how to get your roll on...
Seriously? Look at the curve at the back of his pants. That's more shape than I've seen on the vast majority of pants on this forum, and I think it looks great. Not a look I want for myself, and they could still be trimmer for him. The front could also be tweaked. However, any critique that says these pants don't have any shape is just plain wrong. It may not be shape that you like, but that's entirely different.
With apologies to the thread, a blazer--but the only DB I own with real belly--buttoned three ways:
With apologies to the thread
If you cut the heads off of this picture, it would be MBreinin and I having a conversation in Vox's closet.